Review by IntelliGiantSep 29, 2006(edited over 3 years ago)
The remix tells you that no one can overcome the Original. Key words: filler, no creation, fruity loops.
Listening to the remix one may think about how many $ there should be paid to be in the remix part of the Track. Or another thing. What kind of depression experienced the remixing artist to give such a simple remix. Toooo simple work. Toooo
In both ways the remix is Just a bit adapted to the floor (what’s the sense?), more classical, proggy trance. Usually such kind of release filler is made by the artist himself. But this one is made by an artist, familiar to the sound, and being from such a creative group as techno - IDM creators. The remix carries just a ‘name’ function, no creation at all (creativity is opposite to the no-creativity, and no-creativity is opposite to the creativity). Eat this wonderful Soup but put some spice in it.
-- All the key words are used in this comment but ‘fruity loops’. For this one there’s another key word: imagine.
Listening to the remix one may think about how many $ there should be paid to be in the remix part of the Track. Or another thing. What kind of depression experienced the remixing artist to give such a simple remix. Toooo simple work. Toooo
In both ways the remix is Just a bit adapted to the floor (what’s the sense?), more classical, proggy trance. Usually such kind of release filler is made by the artist himself. But this one is made by an artist, familiar to the sound, and being from such a creative group as techno - IDM creators. The remix carries just a ‘name’ function, no creation at all (creativity is opposite to the no-creativity, and no-creativity is opposite to the creativity). Eat this wonderful Soup but put some spice in it.
-- All the key words are used in this comment but ‘fruity loops’. For this one there’s another key word: imagine.