|
This is good techno.tom wrote:
That bassline would probably sound good on a big system, but the rest was pish
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
longplayer wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Moanerman wrote:
no it's utter shite, it's typical click clack minimal, you can buy 10000000 new releases like this every week. downbytheriver_78 wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Anita_Schmetterling wrote:
Yo doors, I'm really happy for you, and I'm gonna let you finish, but Scooter has the best technoes of all time!!!!!11111unounoeinseins
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Lostsignol wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Lostsignol wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Lostsignol edited this message about 1 month ago. skeptical wrote:
it's "beatport techno"... a new genre engineered by beatport. it basically sounds like tech-house, but mixed with late 90's trance and a bit of early 90's techno. it always contains copious amounts of sidechained white noise, and there are indeed 500,000 releases per week... most of these releases are beatport exclusives. :P skeptical edited this message about 1 month ago. Moanerman wrote:
skepticalit's "beatport techno"... a new genre engineered by beatport. it basically sounds like tech-house, but mixed with late 90's trance and a bit of early 90's techno. it always contains copious amounts of sidechained white noise, and there are indeed 500,000 releases per week... most of these releases are beatport exclusives. :P WORD! doors wrote:
well I don't know, I don't check beatport, I buy records, but if indeed there is 1000000000000 releases like that every week, I guess I will have to start checking Minimal? Minimal?! You guys should lay off the ketamine (or actually isn't that the "minimal" drug??) and stop with the "all new music that come out suck, everything is minimanimal!!!, I want to go back to the 90's because I am too old and I didn't do anything with my life, bla bla bla" Minimal is definitely the most overused genre name, EVER. Minimal is a fuckin adjective, "something that is minimalistic", and that also apply to music that was around way before electronic music. Can't you guys think for yourself? Can't you express your opinion without labeling something as "minimal", just because it's cool to hate it? thanks longplayer for being the only one contributing something useful, unfortunately the link doesn't work for me.. what was it? ibbjamin wrote:
I like minimal, techno, and all inbetween. I definitely am not cool. Not all new music sucks - I like quite a bit of it.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
With that being said, the posted track certainly is nowhere near good enough to start a thread about. sorry mate tom wrote:
ibbjaminI like minimal, techno, and all inbetween. I definitely am not cool. Not all new music sucks - I like quite a bit of it. Ditto. doors You can't post something & then expect everyone to like it because you do. Opinions = Arseholes, an all that ;)doors wrote:
tomDitto. doors You can't post something & then expect everyone to like it because you do. Opinions = Arseholes, an all that ;) Sorry I didn't want to come across like that, I respect the opinions of everyone, but I guess what sat me off was the anti-minimal sentiment in this thread, and to an extent on the whole board. I probably wouldn't even responded if the word "minimal" wouldn't have been mentioned. For me, minimal music is music of a minimalistic nature. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CitwdkKB-oY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxO8Q8XHlUk (I guess it was called ambient then..) and that I understand that it's not everybody's cup of tea, and myself I rarely listen to any of it. But the original link I posted? "Minimal" is not a word that crossed my mind for even a fraction of a second. Techno. There is no other word for it. Some of you might not like it, and I respect that, but I thought some of you would, which is why I posted the thread. skeptical say it perfectly why I like it:
skepticalit basically sounds like tech-house, but mixed with late 90's trance and a bit of early 90's techno. I like tech-house , I like 90's trance, and I love 90's techno.. So the best of all three in one? Why not? But hey, if you guys don't like it, it's totally fine. Instead, post stuff that you consider good new techno. Others might like it. longplayer wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
longplayer edited this message about 1 month ago. tekkno-guy wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
Anita_Schmetterling wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you keep this thread going for a while, you'll all eventually agree on what is minimal techno and which are good tracks.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
djerome wrote:
doorsBut the original link I posted? "Minimal" is not a word that crossed my mind for even a fraction of a second. Techno. There is no other word for it. Some of you might not like it, and I respect that, but I thought some of you would, which is why I posted the thread. The track you posted reminded me of hearing something John Digweed would play in a "progressive house" set 8 years ago to a redbull & vodka crowd in LA. The form of music is terrible back then and it's still terrible today no matter what name they're calling it. Techno used to be about inventing new sounds, new rhythms. there was absolutely nothing inventive in the track you posted. Anita_Schmetterling wrote:
Oh, I see what you did there.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
doors wrote:
hey Lady Butterfly
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
I don't know if you have something against me, but I have nothing against you. *hug* Anita_Schmetterling wrote:
Hey, I said some of the most neutral stuff in this thread! I didn't go Manimal on your ass! I'll hug you though!
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
sea.envy wrote:
lol. i'm still debating with myself whether i should post that i like this track...
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
GASHWORTH wrote:
So are we gonna start posting any good techno?
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
doors wrote:
good question. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcLv2WI626w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT3rQ_fw-78 sherbert wrote:
This guy is producing some good stuff under various guises. Forget labels and genres this is just really good tripped out, abstract weirdness. This is the right stuff.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
The Sun God http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q8wC3XMbgE skeptical wrote:
doorsI like tech-house , I like 90's trance, and I love 90's techno.. So the best of all three in one? Why not? true... but why not do it properly - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btmeic54YhQ :) ijonny wrote:
If I heard the song in the OP out at a club or party, I would tap my toe to it. Hell, even the break downs don't even make me furious.
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
bedhed3000 wrote:
The bassline that comes in at about the 3 minute mark is really wicked. sherbert wrote:
The first time i listened to the track The Streams i really liked the intro but thought that when the rhythm and bass line were brought in it didn`t fit well with the pretty Ambient beginning. But after a couple of listens i now really like the track. Good stuff. I checked SKPRecordings discography and only see files listed in the database. Do you put out physical media vinyl/cd? ogshags wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoo6aMndjqI
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
This is the Shit! edit: this clip sounds like it was taken from Stacey Pullen's mix CD, not that that's bad... ogshags edited this message about 1 month ago. djfrankiebones wrote:
I liked it. I'd play it. But it's more closer to a progressive MNML track, then techno. Look, I like to just call these these things techno myself, but a technohead ain't gonna have it like that. This is techno: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHu5kBHdLu0 ogshags wrote:
this is good techno
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...uDYQ&feature=related doors wrote:
good stuff wtf? progressive minimal? I understand the need for categorizing music, but isn't this going a bit too far? Ah well I don't want to argue about it anymore, but it seem that for new tracks to be considered "techno", it has to be a fast pounding banging full-on audio assault. Not that I don't like Audio Assault, it's good music, I like this track: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ37FSC2ui8 GASHWORTH wrote:
djfrankiebonesdjfrankiebones wrote: quote selection doors This is good techno. I liked it. I'd play it. But it's more closer to a progressive MNML track, then techno. Look, I like to just call these these things techno myself, but a technohead ain't gonna have it like that. This is techno: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHu5kBHdLu0 Wow frankie you posted some good techno. Shame I cant play it again coz it reminds me of you now. 1/10. longplayer wrote:
posted about 1 month ago. (
permalink |
report
)
doors wrote:
dude you really got me thinking there, I pondered for hours (ok actually the time it took me to roll a joint), is "progressive minimal" actually genuine as a musical style? I don't know, but the first thing from my collection that come to mind is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMjscXQ-W7o hum.. |