rassel wrote:

Hmmm, this "release" doesn't make any sense to me with or without picture turned off, but probably I'm just too old for this.
But hey, I think it's valid after all, it seems to me this is the nature of Noise and it's just backed up by some video installations, so ok.

squonk57 wrote:

What about this:

- user edits release
- 2 other users point out an error
- user does not react for 3 months
- I have the release, so I go and correct the error
- first user re-appears, calls it "micky-mouse-bullshit" and changes it back

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=551288

I guess that's a good laugh for the "micky-mouse", but an EI for the edit, right?

jweijde wrote:

Apparently he doesn't understand the concept of ANV's. I doubt he has a different booklet than you or that he will respond to rogerfrace's question anytime soon.

drcscape wrote:

I voted correct by mistake. Could someone please get the balance right by voting NMC (or what they see fit). Thanks.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1864182#latest

marcelrecords wrote:

^^ one more needed...

punxtr wrote:

Club "Intim 6" Mit Dem Orchester Dr. Fummel - Schlüsselloch Folge 5 - Seid Nett Aufeinander

I don't know German, but this seems wrong.

marcelrecords wrote:

I do know German and apart from the record being in doubtful taste, I do not quite see what you mean.
Wonder what the scans will be like!

Internaut wrote:

^^ Something like this I guess: http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=1000151 (related item btw)

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1856107


this was submitted as unique release, but it's not, as it is jsut a repress with identical artwork and from the same masters. you can't tell it apart from the earlier pressings.

DriesBosma wrote:

What is going on here?!

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1859720#latest

Is gaerHART a websubmitter?

punxtr wrote:

Does the main artist not seem like a collaboration name not separated into each artist? Club Intim whatever with the Dr Fummel Orchestra? Something like that?

marcelrecords wrote:

Ah, now I get your point! It looks more to me like a totally made-up spoof name for studio musicians. Most certainly these are not artists that record under these monikers separately.

Hankey wrote:

This is the 5th time I ask for a vote on this release...

http://www.discogs.com/release/1821744

Someone, please vote!

Salutaurs wrote:

Please help me with voting. My mistake was that I did a mass update (correction), before discussed it in forum. And result was conflict with some user. So can someone consider my arguments and help me with voting.

The point is that I added and changed ANV for Brainstorm (originally named Prāta Vētra). "Brainstorm" is English translation of Prāta Vētra (Brain=Prāta, Storm=Vētra).
I decided to change Prāta Vētra as main artist (and Brainstorm as ANV) because of that they have used Latvian version of name for more releases and 11 years before they started to use Brainstorm.
And the point from guidelines:
Artist Name Variation (ANV)
> 3. The ANV should link to the most relevant version of the Artists Name.

Example from database:
The same situation with no problems is Gebrüder Grimm (The Grimm Brothers) where the main artist name is in original language.
> http://www.discogs.com/artist/Gebr%C3%BCder+Grimm

The reason in conflict are that some users think that the main artist must be the first added. (But it would be incorrect if RHCP wold be added before Red Hot Chili Peppers).

I hope I'm not violating the Guidelines now.

Thanks in advance

Internaut wrote:

This users subs/changes could need some cleaning-up (for those who have the time and motivation..): UWANTVINYLIGOTIT

punxtr wrote:

Mute Socialite - Cheap Clocks
Mute Socialite - More Popular Than Presidents And Generals

This was requested by Moe! himself so I see it as votes on his submissions. I just helped correct them :)

Edit--This vote was a mistake due to some contradictory statements in the guidelines: Unison (13) - The Sum

Nik said it's okay. Vote it Correct please.

vinyl-addict wrote:

Complete & Correct ?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1668344#latest

nik wrote:

That should be voted Entirely Incorrect.

I have removed both users involved from voting for a while.

rile3e wrote:

This needs removal. It's a websub. Thanks

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1825633#latest

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=834489

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1182046#latest

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1249689#latest

not sure about this one. just a caps change

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1252256#latest

correct

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1033961#latest

trivial & correct caps change

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=846115#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=846122#latest

both trivial & correct

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=222356

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=116980

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=476656

correct edit


and this: Kim Wilde - The Singles Collection 1981 - 1993 is a duplicate entry of the above one. it was submitted considerably later and contains less info so it should be merged into the above one

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=252185

trivial & correct update by distro

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=617378 correct

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=113516 unresolved question to voters

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=20602#latest trivial

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=53134 semi edit war. imho, the last update is correct


http://www.discogs.com/history?release=68769#latest trivial

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=397884 now correct I'd say

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1075192 trivial & correct

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=168423#latest

deMonne wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1632670

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1661281

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1736131

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1123580

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1318157

thanks

consort wrote:

punxtr wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1468518#latest

Man is making a big stand for nothing. Please, someone better explain the guidelines to him.

consort wrote:

I'm not saying it's perfect or in a final state, but the last vote here is far from the mark. Please help balance it? There is nothing essentially wrong and while it could perhaps be more informative (if needed?), there are no changes required for the profile to be valid:

http://www.discogs.com/history...l=EMI+Records#latest

squonk57 wrote:

This has been voted Correct but actually still needs correction ("new artist" Len Bezerk is a typo of Len Berzerk):

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=446748

I explained to lenberzerk by mail how to create an ANV and he promised to fix it, but didn't do it so far.

PabloPlato wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/Donna-S...ou-Baby/master/85357

can someone vote one of these US editions for removal?

it seems they are both the same (same cat# on labels), and one is listed as an LP (even though it is a 12")

Internaut wrote:

A new seller who seems to think entering tracklistings is a waste of time: MM360

comkai wrote:

pending release removal of a homemade mix tape by user.
please comment when voting!
thanks.

dopemix wrote:

It's NO TAPE, moron!

DriesBosma wrote:

Sigh..

http://www.discogs.com/user/andytheangler

prophet3011 wrote:

EMI / EMI Records?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1838765#latest

muntz wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/Cocteau...t-Pig/release/184967
thank you

SmotheredHope wrote:

Are these really eligible?

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=bim2104

Internaut wrote:

hmmm..: Michael Jackson - The Ultimate Collection

musicmann1 wrote:

Please help me get off this CIP. I have made a few errors but have tried to fix them. I have alot more titles to add. If you see any mistakes I can fix, please let me know.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Is the info from the internet or do you own all of these releases?

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1856107

removal pending.

imho a dupe

consort wrote:

if mrdj666 could be banned, please?

musicmann1 wrote:

[quote=SmotheredHope][/quote]
I absolutely own everything I have submitted.
I have worked really hard to fix all my listings and taken all the advice I have been given by other users. If you could take the time to look over my releases and vote positively if you believe the information is correct I would sure like to contribute more.

musicmann1 wrote:

I need some serious help here with my submissions a Please help out if you can. Some of these titles are pretty rare so I might be screwed

SmotheredHope wrote:

I've had a look at your submissions and you need to correct a few things, please see my comments. Most importantly you need to learn how to enter more formats in one line, see the link I supplied.

And by the way, you're asking for votes in the wrong thread, here's where you should ask for votes on your own submissions:
http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/172073

Salutaurs wrote:

Can I have the same help as musicmann1 to get off the CIP. There are a lot more releases (I own) to add. It would be nice if someone would help me. If I can do something to correct my mistakes, please let me know.

Sorry, guidelines led me here.

Thanks in advance.

MUSICLOVER04 wrote:

The submitter says in submission notes it's a spanish edition meanwhile the country TAG is USA. He does ignore my "gentle" comment about a month ago.
A NmC vote?
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1575880#latest
Thanks.

musicmann1 wrote:

error

Mr.Mystery wrote:

How is this a valid ANV, exactly?
http://www.discogs.com/artist/...93tra?anv=Brainstorm

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I accidentally voted this as correct when it clearly isn't:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1865624#latest

If anyone could vote accordingly it would be super duper.

loukash wrote:

I remember this issue being discussed elsewhere just recently: "Prāta Vētra" apparently means literally "brainstorm" in Latvian.


(Compare e.g. to http://www.discogs.com/artist/...The?anv=Modrý+Efekt )

Also check out http://www.brainstorm.lv - the Latvian version uses "Prāta Vētra" whereas the English and Russian versions use "Brainstorm".

Salutaurs wrote:

Thanks loukash!

I decided to change Prāta Vētra as main artist (and Brainstorm as ANV) because of that they have used Latvian version of name for more releases and 11 years before they started to use Brainstorm.
They started to use Brainstorms as more common name for international community, but still credits the same songs to both names. An they sometimes release the same albums for both markets, local and international.

Internaut wrote:

You might want to take a look at this thread before you start such mass-changes again: http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/193062

Salutaurs wrote:

"deleted"

Salutaurs wrote:

"deleted"

Salutaurs wrote:

error

Salutaurs wrote:

Thanks, now I know. Because of that I'm here.
So now every new submission I'm making more carefully.

P.S. And I found some more ANVs that should be corrected, but that in future off course.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

So if it's a white label it's always a test pressing too, right?

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=tunes4u

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history...erge+Caranzan#latest

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1264329#latest

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=746546#latest

legumes-SALES wrote:

this is one of countless adult orientated schlager/easy listening LPs, most probably combined with erotic cover artwork.

wordplays and (cheap) sexual puns are what such releases are about & make for their initially strange appearance. and rightly so. ;)


the notes are pretty ugly, but the info in the entry itself seems correct. I haven't really checked anything tho

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I've exhausted myself with this one, this just doesn't seem to go right... could someone else try before I pop a vein?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1888163#latest

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Me again...

I was going to vote/comment on this, but quite honestly I have no idea what the hell is going on in the sub... maybe someone else could take a look?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1891378#latest

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1563955

submitter could use some help + the release image needs removal, as it is not from the release, but from the artist's old website. in fact, there is no picture for this release.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Need some No-votes here so it can be updated:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1890326#latest

Mr.Mystery wrote:

So apparently URL is a valid cat# now...

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1897788#latest

sanberg101 wrote:

please put him on CIP!

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=nhdiystrec

SmotheredHope wrote:

I have just gone through them all in detail and left comments on all, he really should be pushed to the CIP so he takes the time to read the guidelines - if anyone else wants to vote it is now easy using "as above" since I have checked all the details and specified exactly what needs to be changed.

Edit: He seems to changing some of them now so lets give him a chance before placing any more votes.

Internaut wrote:

Is this valid: GxSxOxGxPx / Gory / K7A / TxTxSxWxTxGxOxTxGx / AxBxNx / Neojazz Shitfest / SxSxTxNx - 7-way-rehearsalsplit ?

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I don't know... I just stared at it for a while and quickly walked away.

rassel wrote:

bye

desioner wrote:

Hi voters et al.
Perfume (2) - Perfume ~Complete Best~
Is in need of a vote.
Thanks in advance.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Stumbled across this gem yesterday:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1899162#latest

Voted on it, then got the following message in my inbox:



Which was nice.

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1674480

dupe (see link on the history page).

submitter hasn't responded after 7 weeks

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1569741

might be a websub after all

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Could someone check these out? These seem to be websubs but I need a second opinion:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1901402#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1901395#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1901390#latest

Release dates are weeks away, nobody owns them, no any information of any kind, no images...

vinyl-addict wrote:

Since when a matrix number and a catalogue number are both used together in the cat# section to differentiate between releases ?

Thanks

http://www.discogs.com/Papercl...le-Steam/master/4604

loukash wrote:

Could you please have a look at kyledbyron's pending submissions?
http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=kyledbyron
This user obviously still has got quite a lot to learn… :(
Thanks

Mr.Mystery wrote:

If you've got spare time on your hands, here's a lot of stuff that needs to be fixed...

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=pitchkracht.nl

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1434137

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1837728


this is an accidental duplicate entry of Rote Gitarren* - Consuela

the user wanted to fix a small mistake.


needs removal.

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1451103

voted C despite wrong format

legumes-SALES wrote:

g

ahem

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Here's something fun to go through:

http://www.discogs.com/advance...&btn=Search+Releases

marcelrecords wrote:

this is nice too:
http://www.discogs.com/advance...&btn=Search+Releases

Mr.Mystery wrote:

And this:

http://www.discogs.com/advance...&btn=Search+Releases

SmotheredHope wrote:

Lots of stuff to go through here

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Phonographic.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=kKrakK

The tone of this user's submission notes suggests there might be trouble ahead. Ie. "I used Various Artists because I wanted to" etc.

Se-BusT-eL wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=984035#latest

crazy credits

Salutaurs wrote:

Check please this one, need to correct some errors:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1812949#latest

Klanzky wrote:

[quote=Se-BusT-eL][/quote] http://www.discogs.com/history?release=984035#latest

crazy credits



i tryed to clean up a little, can sombody do the credit in tracks for moon63.
i have to go to work now (-:

Mr.Mystery wrote:

As far as I can remember it's not the first time we've had problems with these DeepCitySoul people:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=DeeCeeEss

Everything here is just utterly, utterly wrong and the user clearly has no idea what he's doing. Maybe someone who has a bit of a longer nerve than I could help him out? I'm seriously pulling my hair out here...

jweijde wrote:

^^ "Artists names and Song titles fall into the Capitalisation exception "
Since when? Isn't that the sole reason why the Capitalization Rules exist, the artist names and song titles?