eggbartrum wrote:

I would like like some help here please.
Whilst checking this submission.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1453232#latest

I made the mistake of asking for this submission to be removed.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1191970#latest

I now realise that it should be the first submission that I checked that should be removed as the submitter should have checked the warning.

Would you please be kind enough to look at this one http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1191970#latest and vote accordingly. If favourable I can then ammend the credits.

I am pretty sure that http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1453232#latest this is the duplicate as the images display almost the same information apart from one disc has a solid centre and the other is cropped I also think they are both Uk.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Calling for some back up as I feel things might get ugly with this person:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1658156#latest

Edit:
Seems like the user has some major attitude issues with every other submission as well - he refuses to make required changes because "who cares?". It's also starting to seem like he might not even have some of these records he's submitting.

muntz wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1441732#latest

thank you

Jayfive wrote:

I know I keep saying the same thing, but if he continues to get shirty, get nik on to him. Asking for A/B tracklist for a vinyl release is not unreasonable.

brajoapau wrote:

we-be-go should be his username...
REMOVE the lot I'dd say ;-)

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Yeah, I know. I don't want to do that quite yet, though.

nickacid wrote:

can I through in my 2p and suggest that sometimes, once in a while, if you come across a sub that you can update yourself easily rather than leaving notes on them that the original submitter may never see - you just edit + update it yourself?

At least message the submitter so they know to go check whatever needs checking.

That would be my 2p.

marcelrecords wrote:

voted...

8m2stereo wrote:

Correct or Entirely Incorrect ?

label seems to read "Share My Rhythm (Isolee Rmx)"

Producer [Remix] ?
or Remix [Producer] ?
or Producer, Remix ?
or Remix, Producer ?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=912402

marcelrecords wrote:

another C&C farce, please vote to counterbalance here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1656991#latest

brajoapau wrote:

OMG!
Do they even read the Voting Guidelines?!?

Internaut wrote:

This user needs some guiding: billysvinylemporium

lostin_music wrote:

this guy seems to be in doubt to wether he has CD's or Vehicles
(the first couple of submissions listed all have 'car' in format)
http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Eurotone

8m2stereo wrote:

heeelp.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=912402#latest

something needed here after a
totally unjustified E.I. vote on my update,

need it to fix the A. Neumann profile upon his request,

thanks.

8m2stereo wrote:

the above has been fixed, thx.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Can you use an ANV for Various like this?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1663572#latest

Jayfive wrote:

Ive answered that question on the submission :)

KrissO wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=1586401

This is a white label, right?

KrissO wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=1448333
And this?

Jayfive wrote:

Yes and yes :)

Mr.Mystery wrote:

What to do with a submission that's a complete shambles and stuck in a limbo? I'd put it up for removal but there are other owners on it too...

http://www.discogs.com/RIM-SHO...-EP8/release/1559430

Jayfive wrote:

You call me :) All fixed up now

Mr.Mystery wrote:

You are a much braver man than I am. If only that were the only one, though...

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Am I being unclear or something?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1662936#latest

Someone else take over.

KrissO wrote:

Pretty frustrating :/

DriesBosma wrote:

Well, it only can get better.. Or not?
:-D

Jayfive wrote:

Tsk. Thats gratitute for you. You fix the sub and just as its all done, the submitter flounces and tries to remove it.

DriesBosma wrote:

double

KrissO wrote:

lol :s

KrissO wrote:

Did a small update on that sub.

silverleaf wrote:

Did another update to it.
Also, could someone look at this and tell me when they think enough waiting on the OS is enough?
Time to remove or ask again? http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1346017

schtel wrote:

^ I would say wait a few more weeks, send him a PM also. :)

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Did you take a look at his other submissions? He hasn't been active in 8 months and even then he only cared about tracks he was involved in. I'm thinking none of those credits he added actually appear on any of the records.

Jayfive wrote:

Ive put it up for removal - vote away on that and his other subs - based on the info in the above post I recommend EI votes

Christopher_Jion wrote:

I'd attack this one.... but I figure someone else may want to ..

http://www.discogs.com/Bj%C3%B...emix/release/1664630

dont web-releases need to have cat.#'s???

Mr.Mystery wrote:

This jolly votefest needs more attendants:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1481356#latest

SmotheredHope wrote:

One more NMC needed here to change to NMC status instead of correct:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1634083#latest

silverleaf wrote:

SmotheredHope, voted & status was changed.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Everything is wrong:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Hardtraxx2005

Jayfive wrote:

What it needs is people to leave it alone and get nik to sort it out. Clearly theres some kind of bug that means anything with conflicting votes never gets resolved. That Two On One debacle proved that.




All those submissions need the vinyl format removing, best guess is the submitter couldnt see 'File' as the base format rather than any attempt to pretend the releases were on vinyl. Which they aren't - its a digital only label by the looks of it.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Thanks a bunch, also thanks Mr.Mystery & julesparis for seeing a few more errors that I didn't notice at first.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Same here, another NMC vote needed to change status. Can't believe how some things are voted through...

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1516465#latest

Haze wrote:

Need some NOs for an incorrect removal request: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=86849#latest

And he did some more, check under: http://www.discogs.com/submissions?mode=removals

Jayfive wrote:

Ive voted no on all of the removals and also PMed him with a link to 'manage inventory'

Also, vote here to have more protection from incorrect removals like this:
http://www.discogs.com/disbugs/563

Haze wrote:

Sorry Jay, but Disbugs isn't an option for me for some time now.

marcelrecords wrote:

done...

marcelrecords wrote:

someone's trying to start an edit war, please have a look here and comment, thanks.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1562820#latest

Jayfive wrote:

Ive EI'd it, if he does it again, get nik

SmotheredHope wrote:

Thanks mr!

silverleaf wrote:

[Taken care of]

marcelrecords wrote:

thx Jay and Jules for the vote...

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submiss...abel=Trackitdown.net

has a number of wrongly pending removals
that need some more

NO votes (different formats)

so they can be further updated,

thx.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I'm not really quite sure what's happening here:

http://www.discogs.com/Various...hina/release/1667439

Maybe someone would like to take a look?

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=miniload

just in case anyone feels like moderating ..

voted all needs changing already, modded one ..

thx.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Some help needed here:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=VinilAmore

User has never (as far as I can see) edited any of his over 100 submissions based on comments/votes, never checks any links, never adds remix credits (or any other credits for that matter) and so on...

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=prog
I've been watching this person submit all day and... I'm beginning to wonder whether these are even official releases...

SmotheredHope wrote:

Since most (all?) items submitted are for sale by sergirecords who is on the CIP my guess is that this is old sergi (who was brought up in the forums before) trying to bypass the CIP. The submission errors and lack of understanding of how to submit items properly, correct mistakes etc has the exact same pattern.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Good catch, seems to be the same person indeed.

SmotheredHope wrote:

He's blindly copying CD submissions to draft and submits them as cassettes without changing anything. Like:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1670317#latest

Format: Cassette, Album
Notes: This Enhanced CD contains a link to Reprise Records website for Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring soundtrack.

Pretty much all submissions were NMC so that's what he got from me... :)

He's keeping up submitting and ignoring all comments, should be put on the CIP manually.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1670452#latest

8m2stereo wrote:

re: above problem user "prog"

this one has been voted C+C, i suppose blindly,
needs more votes to be marked NMICH,
as it has been simply copied unchanged from the vinyl.

i highly doubt it can be C+C,
definitely needs checking by next owner.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1670670#latest

SmotheredHope wrote:

Definately not C+C, NMiC at best. "First edition contained a poster" - pfff.

I've kept an eye on this user and has voted NMC on virtually all submissions since most, if not all, are incorrect. I have also sent a PM to Nik because I doubt the CIP will pick him up - the formula seems not to be working at all, it seems like the only times the CIP comes into effect is if a new user gets 3-4 Needs Major Changes right away.

Haze wrote:

Need some NOs again for a removal request - http://www.discogs.com/history?release=56846#latest

SmotheredHope wrote:

Another interesting fact is that all of the cassettes he's submitting is for sale, many of them still sealed, which makes it obvious he doesn't know if all the credits appear on the releases or not.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

He's still going on strong.

8m2stereo wrote:

maybe it is because he got one

totally wrong c&c vote on an early sub. here

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1670670#latest

unfortunately the voting history and wrong voter
can not be seen anymore, but i PMed him about this blunder,
no reply though. ( http://www.discogs.com/user/Antracot )


He's still going on strong and totally wrong:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=prog

Internaut wrote:

Then stop giving him NMiC votes, it helps him stay out of the CIP list (and he obviously should be in that list..)

8m2stereo wrote:

i have left this note on all applicable submussion by him,
for most i feel it qualifies for more

NeedsMajorChanges :

"if your tape is still sealed how did you retrieve the credits ??

copy from another release is in this case not allowed, you must present the info on your copy !"

SmotheredHope wrote:

Like Internaut says, I guess the best thing to do is to ONLY vote on the ones that needs major changes, and stay away from those that only needs minor changes. If he only gets NMaC he might finally get a lowered average which should put him on the CIP. Still no word from nik, I sent a PM to him yesterday about this annoying guy, and asked him to put him on the CIP manually.

His current average is:
Average Vote Received: Needs Minor Changes (2.76, 172 votes)

If he gets under 2.50 it will say Needs Major Changes which puts him on the CIP, or?

Dekadenz wrote:

Not released yet, submitter obviously doesn't own a physical copy:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1671316#latest

Needs to be removed.



Seems that this guy ( hudschi) could do with some holidays on da CIP:

http://www.discogs.com/release...ributed?user=hudschi

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=mezzo_templer

remove ? -> a collection of TransLucent gems,

partly remove 2 or 3 times already,
resubbed by same user, but he's on CIP now ..

thx.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Those should be removed yes, a discussed in the help forums.

mawiles wrote:

Daytona is a confessing websubmitter. Please vote on my removal requests.

Further submissions of him on
Anjunabeats & Anjunadeep
must be removed as well, except the ones he has in his collection (which is almost none).

8m2stereo wrote:

could someone please put these up for removal then again,
he PMed me the other day almost crying
how unfair this would be ..

i'll vote then ..

thx.

Dekadenz wrote:

Messy duplicate:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1671296#latest

It's actually the same as this:

http://www.discogs.com/Roey-Ma...szeit/release/648302

Mr.Mystery wrote:

And he's awake again...

nik wrote:

I have put this user onto the CIP.

The algorithm takes into account much more than just a users total score, and also the CIP 'runs' once a day, so there may be a lag between spotting a problem user, giving them votes, and that user getting on the CIP. I think he would have ended up there tomorrow in any case.

nik wrote:

Correct, user now banned from submitting, sergirecords still on the CIP.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=prog

on the CIP now, but still going strong
with very unlikely updates
from mostly "still sealed" tapes he wants to sell,

he's all over the place in his edits ..

buu-huu ..

SmotheredHope wrote:

I've noticed too that he only updates the tracknumbering from 1, 2, 3 to A1, A2 etc - he doesn't bother about changing anything else (some still says "CD contains" etc in the notes field though they're cassettes). Credits are still there - we have no idea if they're on the release or not... total ignorance.

I'll try to find some time to comment on them.

Well, at least he's on the CIP...

stryder01 wrote:

please vote my releases

Jayfive wrote:

This thread is to ask for votes on other people's submissions, to ask for votes on your own go here:
http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/172073?page=4

silverleaf wrote:

Does anyone know what it takes to get a resolution here? http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1481356

Jayfive wrote:

Other than hassling nik and teo to fix whatever bug that caused that, then no :S

SmotheredHope wrote:

It's not a bug, it's a feature. ;) Democracy at its best. :P

silverleaf wrote:

How much (per cent) does 'The System' want for a majority vote?

SmotheredHope wrote:

76% if I'm not mistaken.

silverleaf wrote:

Ok, makes sense. Thanks for letting me know.

oparischka wrote:

can someone look at the subs from schokh

not sure if all these "Unofficial Russian Releases" realy exist

example Par+Media+Music

consort wrote:

^^^ Functioning link: Par Media Music

oparischka wrote:

thanks

legumes-SALES wrote:

edit

mawiles wrote:

I discovered several websubmitters in the last days.
Please have a look in the removal list.

I even needed to start a personal websubmitter list again to keep an eye on those. Am I the only one to have the feeling that the number of websubmissions is increasing?

Haze wrote:

No

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1232860#latest

someone added Speedcore as style on a Depeche Mode release!

SmotheredHope wrote:

Easy mistake, it's next to synthpop in the style drop down menu. :)

brajoapau wrote:

Fixed ;-)

8m2stereo wrote:

a bunch of junk by

http://www.discogs.com/user/VinilAmore

up for removal now, sergi-stuff still needs closer inspection ..

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1407009#latest


Needs Minor or Major Changes


remix artist for track 3 is wrong. it has already been voted correct, though, and it is not immediately obvious, if it's just the name of the mix or by another artist


investigating the mix artist on track 2 seems like a good idea, too. doesn't fit the back-cat# of that artist

jacquou_le_croquant wrote:

I need votes to get out of the CIP. Thanks !

Christopher_Jion wrote:

HOLY FUCKING SHIT...

http://www.discogs.com/DAD-AND...-EVE/release/1680360