CAPTAIN_DJ wrote:

The determination format's release were added "Maxi Single" without their evidence supporting the truth and accuracy of interpretation.

Details/History: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=208601#latest

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Here come the medleys. Again.

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=DOUBLEG

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submiss...item=release/1655076

should have voted "major"
for totally wrong joint-artist
in credits upon remoderation ..

the other subs. need him desparately too ..

;-)

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=26821#latest

This is getting more and more bizarre by the minute.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

This label (?) needs a throrough going over:

http://www.discogs.com/label/Khaki

File type is missing on just about every release and who knows what else...

SmotheredHope wrote:

Well, I'm not surprised. That's the most stubborn user I've ever come across on Discogs.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Yeah, I've noticed...

Mr.Mystery wrote:

It's descending into a full-on edit war now. I'm not going to touch it again as it's obviously not going to change anything.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Is there any point in edits like these?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=76324#latest

Jayfive wrote:

Edit war = tell nik

consort wrote:

Needs CIP until at least QSG is read & grokked: http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Madmanmac

Dekadenz wrote:

Submission has been removed before due to pure guesswork. Now it's back again, edited, but... still pure guesswork.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1671316#latest

DriesBosma wrote:

This really puzzles me...:

http://www.discogs.com/Dark-Wa...tion/release/1484551
http://www.discogs.com/Dj-Chri...tion/release/1466425

Mr.Mystery wrote:

"who are You to bother me anyway?"

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1683967#latest

8m2stereo wrote:

well, err, umm, maybe he was only,
like,
puzzeled by your self-chosen nickname ?

;-)

rassel wrote:

Interesting:

The label Slušaj Najglasnije!
has a link to
http://www.gla.ac.uk/~dc4w/lis...udest/catalogue.html
and in the first sentence there it's written:

Slusaj najglasnije! (Listen Loudest!) is not a label. It's an independent announcer and a one-man operation since 1987.

Aha

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Interestingly enough it's not even self-chosen. But that's another story ;)

silverleaf wrote:

DriesBosma, Thanks for getting me curious about those too. I don't know what programs you have to look at this with, but if you take the 2 front covers and turn them negative (to compare) an interesting thing shows up on one. I'm certainly no expert, but the 2nd one http://www.discogs.com/Dj-Chri...tion/release/1466425 appears 'questionable' with respect to the name change.
Again, I'm no expert, but take a look.

Kepe wrote:

Maybe we should finally get rid of this "sorry for a submission":
http://www.discogs.com/Seguida...-III/release/1167901

I guess it's right to just remove it when there's not even 90% of the tracks submitted, it's just for promoting the band like myspace page.

s.u.r.g.e.r.y. wrote:

if someone can be bothered,

http://www.discogs.com/label/Wizard+(4)
http://www.discogs.com/label/DS+Music
http://www.discogs.com/label/JOE+Music
http://www.discogs.com/Various-9BE-2/release/1687181
http://www.discogs.com/Todd-Terry-Resolutions/release/1687207

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Wrong thread.

s.u.r.g.e.r.y. wrote:

My mistake

;)

myklbrooks wrote:

I have a websubmission that needs removal votes.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1642555#latest

I commented on a need for an ANV and got this pm:




thanks in advance

Haze wrote:

consort wrote:

^^^ LOL!!!
... and whoa?

silverleaf wrote:

Bump for a previous request for removal votes http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1481356

comkai wrote:

someone please take care of leifmuntjak, who is moving all entries of Leif to Leif (3),
just to become artist (1) on discogs.
don't have the time myself, but i'm pretty sure every single edit is EI.

edit: some edits need to be reverted to the previous version as he did multiple edits sometimes!
edit2: hell, i have to leave now! see http://www.discogs.com/history?release=757794#latest

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=leifmuntjak

bonkers, needs rather urgent inspection ..

found this:

original "Leif", url set 2 years ago: http://www.myspace.com/leif

now removed by above user .. ??

the other could be

http://www.myspace.com/leiftrimsound

as coomkai says :
.. is the artist who was entered first in the database and has dozens of releases....

HELP ?

thx.

fallguy wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submiss...item=release/1690637
I think there are some websubmissions going on by this user. Wants the stuff he is submitting.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Could someone take a look at these:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=williamkane

Most/all of his subs need major work but I spotted at least one sub that was just an illegally leaked torrent, and I have a feeling there are others too. I don't have the time to go through all of these right now.

muntz wrote:

are these valid ANVs:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=486766#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=100507#latest
?

SmotheredHope wrote:

Someone REALLY need to have a look at those subs... I'll try to find the time tonight but if anyone else is up for it go ahead... heaps of errors and questionable subs.

8m2stereo wrote:

went through all above incl. comments and votes,

needs some more quick MaCh votes please, thx.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I just noticed he's actually hijacked someone else's artist profile - every single one of those releases should be in Alex Gilbert (2)

consort wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=tipit2001

Ronaldvd wrote:

Could someone vote on this duplicate: Various - Rawkus Hip Hop Classics Vol. 1

silverleaf wrote:

consort, I left a couple of comments and I'll check back on them.

consort wrote:

^^ tipit2001 = more discopatrick copy/paste?

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=mrdj666

intersting that you can still, after removal,
see his junk subs for sale ..

consort wrote:

€60.00/ea. o.m.f.g.
Think we may have a returning nuisance - don't recall user names, but do remember similar MADONNA!1! rushes from the past.

Edit: duh, just scrolled down the items for sale ... it's the same user as before.

8m2stereo wrote:

i just PM sent him:

http://www.discogs.com/help/su...delines-release.html

his reply:

thanks ???????????????? why???????????????

.. he is listed on the CIP as of 4 months ago,
need close monitoring and appropriate votes i guess ..

Mop66 wrote:

Can this be correct what the guy is doing here:
Various - Untitled

consort wrote:

fleshmeatdoll wrote:

somebody capable of French can you please explain the submission guidelines to this user?

http://www.discogs.com/user/FRED03
especially here:
http://www.discogs.com/submiss...item=release/1485083
i pointed out the most apparent errors earlier, but he doesn't get it, obviously.

consort wrote:

EARHATE should not be voting.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1631558#latest
^ needs a pile of NMiC votes.

8m2stereo wrote:

EARHATE should not be voting.

.. from his artist profile:

Nihilism and absolute disgust are my primary influences.

.. that and voting privilidge .. mmhhh ..

Mr.Mystery wrote:

His submissions need some looking into as well - especially the older ones.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/release...uted?user=wildmax797

is probably bailing out and wants "his" stuff removed,

being a qualified, longtime Oliver Onions expert

he has become resistant to my moderating help
(which he privately requested) after one day ..

i also had very unfriendly PM replys by him ..

only then did i cast the votes to markup the problematic subs.

8m2stereo wrote:

^^^

submitter has closed his account after one day, not willing to update to discogs standards after requesting and receiving private german moderation from me ..

no owner, update from pics not possible.

i put the outstanding up for removal, unless someone want's to try and fix, which i feel is not possible.

silverleaf wrote:

Another 'jem' from that person http://www.discogs.com/Earhate...tled/release/1461027
Single-Sided Cassette + Only 1 copy made = "Bedroom Release"
Does my math sound right to you?

Edit: Nik, if you have time, check his subs out.
How much more of these sort of responses before consequences?
"eat shit homo" & "once again eat shit"

8m2stereo wrote:

.. PM news from him as well:

"[/quote]

Hurry up and fucking ban me then ,
you whiners and your bullshit are fucking boring me.
Oh no I can't go on discogs
....what a fucking crying shame that would be."

silverleaf wrote:

Anyone Please Vote ! ! !
"home made" 3 x cassette = invalid submission
http://www.discogs.com/Earhate...ross/release/1593169

8m2stereo wrote:

re. EARHATE

my PM regarding toally abusive behaviour and language,
answer from: nik

"Hmmm, thanks for the PM, I have already removed this user from voting this morning, if you see any other problems with him, please let me know."

so maybe someone else needs to speak up, too ..

silverleaf wrote:

Question: What qualifies or disqualifies the validity of a Label?

Specific label in question http://www.discogs.com/label/Total+Vomit+Records
Everything on it seems to be "home recorded" CDr and Cassette Tape, often in VERY limited quantity.
One item was removed this weekend for being an invalid release, ie a Single-Sided Cassette + Only 1 copy made.
A second item that consists of 3 [sole copy] cassette tapes is currently up for removal.
These two 'one off' items were submitted as actually being ON the label.
Does this make or should this make a difference to their validity for this or any other label?
If they had been submitted as Promo would that make any difference?

When does a Bedroom or Garage project calling itself a label actually qualify?
When a business license is obtained or is that necessary for this data base?
Are there posted guidelines about this that I just haven't found yet?

edit: The second item was just removed.

8m2stereo wrote:

.. most of the items seem to have 1,2,
single ones up to 4 or 5 owners,
he's producing physical copies with "artwork" ect.
and they seem to be available for trade or cash buying ..

there is quite a lot of these small labels on cogs,
& there is a long tradition of homemade tapes/cdRs
in some scenes .. ect.pp.

wouldn't waste my time on this ..

silverleaf wrote:

I know there's a lot of very small labels out there, and I don't have any problem with that.
I heard that in his early days MC Hammer was selling out of his car's trunk.
As for "artwork", I think it's safe to say that any one of us could come up with something decent.

I remember from some previous threads that "bedroom" mixes and mix-tapes, etc don't qualify.
But where is the line? Too wide and too gray to define?

And again, if some of the recently removed items had been listed as Promo would that make any difference in status?

My question still is: When does a lot of "bedroom" stuff qualify as a label for this site standards?
Is there any standard other than getting at least 1 other person to say so?

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1611748#latest

User just sent me a PM saying "I am not going to make any more alterations to this listing." with a bunch of other stuff I'm not going to bother replicating here.

8m2stereo wrote:

checked & commented an all, each one needs fixing,

some more short votes after my comments might be necessary ..

thx.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/label/Crazy+Productions
http://www.discogs.com/label/Alex+Gilbert+Studios
http://www.discogs.com/label/Shadowville+Productions
http://www.discogs.com/label/V...+and+Young+Slanteyez
http://www.discogs.com/label/D...27s+Advocate+Records

all made up by the same guy,
i feel all this can safely be sent "back to drafts"
very soon via :

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=williamkane

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Yeah, I get the feeling he isn't coming back or willing to change anything, seeing his average votes received and the last time he did anything...

Might as well boot them all out.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=miniload

all put up for moving "back to drafts",

please .. thx.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=williamkane

all up for "back to drafts", total mess and, importantly,

all with wrong main artist;

no ownwers.

8m2stereo wrote:

just in case someone else also sees these comments
(to justified update requests by various mods)
as total disqualification from the cogs commnity

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=EARHATE :

"you downsyndrome fuck.....dot dot...
don't give a shit now fuck off
fuck you guys are gay
once again eat shit loser
right there you stupid fuck"

maybe also drop nik a line, too ..

he's on the CIP already and still keeps going like this ..

8m2stereo wrote:

sorry, not on CIP,

but "removed from voting" 2 days ago,
and "banned from submitting" today.

DriesBosma wrote:

Guys, have a bit a look at these once and a while:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?mode=removals
In the last weeks the number in the 'queue' doubled.

In many cases they should be removed because they are duplicates and better not end up in collections, wantlists and for sale. Many others should stay and edit, but that is now not possible.

8m2stereo wrote:

it s not such a serious problem though,
the number, doubeled by 250 now,
just came up yesterday because most probably all these
need urgent removal, as requested by moodytrax .

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=getmusic

moodytrax requested 3 moths ago, without any reply:

"where does it actually say "Promo", where did you take the cat# and details from? why isn't this in anyone's collection? do you actually own this release?

you are submitting 300+ so called "dj-promo/whitelabel", all are drafted from the retail entries, without any change other than adding a Promo, White Label. all provided with full credits. and most of them in no one's collection ...

I'm not calling you names, but this smells like serious abuse ... If you really own this records, please provide some evidence (actual cat# in run-outs, promo sheets etc.) and get those entries correct."

8m2stereo wrote:

.. but of course you are pefectly right,
one could drop by on the removal requests once a day,
which is what i tend to do ..

agrabah wrote:

I seem to have accidentaly voted this release: http://www.discogs.com/Mahler-...No-9/release/1553704

as being correct, whereas I only wanted to point out a few issues with the release. Now it's "correct", although it is not. Could you please plaster a few needs minor changes to balance things out?

Thanks,

Tine

8m2stereo wrote:

vot fix done now.

ritual26 wrote:

Hi. I would like to have a second opinion (preferably to back me up... :P) on this:

Envenomist - The Helix

I entered the cat.# as printed on the release, but the guy who owns the label wants the cat.# to be uniform to the other releases he's put out. I have reverted one edit, but he's made the same edit again. I have pointed him to the Submission Guidelines, but he persists...

I have no wish to run a one-man war here. But I do want the info on my submission to be correct. So, please, could someone help me out?

Thanks!

consort wrote:

DJ Pure (Mixtape) ????

lostin_music wrote:

I think someone needs to take a look at this and it's "possible duplicates"

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1689174#latest

8m2stereo wrote:

i remember this as being the way to go for classical,
now

"Dr.SultanAszazin sezz:
Composers should be out of track artists, they're not performing"

not sure if this is a must.

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1650279

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1651397

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1649694

Haze wrote:

There are many of those "no label, no cat#" mix cassettes in the db, mainly submitted by the same users. When I questioned those subs I only got a "these were sold in recodstores in Switzerland". Dunno if anyone else can confirm this.

marcelrecords wrote:

This stems from the fact that Discogs was clearly not designed for accommodating classical releases. Both solutions could be defended. It would be nice to have clear guideline for this kind of classical releases.

Dr.SultanAszazin wrote:

I agree with the choice between the two, with 'as on release' as preference.

Some minor updates could fix the 'classical' difficulties: All artist showed on releases on artist page, a more advanced search engine (search a certain string limited to a certain credit role of choice), a way to index composer's works and link them to tracks,..., well, yea..., maybe a major update...

consort wrote:

Haze: I don't have a clear idea about that "label" (ehem)
but, I saw what you did there ... and, thanks

pawlick wrote:

Please NMiC or correct the sub according the last post:

http://www.discogs.com/Various...2006/release/1645736

but right now it's going under correction

8m2stereo wrote:

better link please ?
directly to release history,
this one goes to each user's saved subs ..

thx.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=monkeygra

someone please look at the latest 15 edits he made
and possibly support my comments ..

thx.

DriesBosma wrote:

Not really a request, but funny nevertheless...:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=28232

"please delete the 's'" :-D

SmotheredHope wrote:

LOL :D

8m2stereo wrote:

31 quick kicks :

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=hudschi

thx.

silverleaf wrote:

Bumping something Mr.Mystery posted top of page. http://www.discogs.com/submiss...item=release/1639160

I commented on this release, but all of this guys subs need a look. http://www.discogs.com/Master-...Funk/release/1659572

consort wrote:

Please remove this:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1712070#latest

12" does not exist, label does not exist, user/artist has submitted and removed it over & over, has it in collection, wantlist and for sale (15 euros), artist is unsigned, only evidence of this online is his myspace blog that offers the discogs page as only evidence and says in Spanish "on vinyl soon jajajjajaj" - database abuse, submission of items that do not exist, spamming of unrelated histories with the megaupload link for the mp3s, has even repeatedly changed the cover art on submission (trying out? art exists nowhere else) ... jajajaj.

consort wrote:

.

Internaut wrote:

Here is an interesting situation: Opus Avantra - Opus Avantra - Donella Del Monaco . Could someone have a look please?

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=874417

should have directly voted E.I. to revert this users useless "update",
he's messing around with many JOY stuff, removing releases and legit artists from releases (some do need a # added though).

please check if you can still revert this one by voting EI,
not soure if this works after my MinorCh vote though ..

i already left comments and votes on all his other mess.

8m2stereo wrote:

UUPS, sorry, completely wrong request link

http://www.discogs.com/Various...t-21/release/1528193

is the one in question above ..

8m2stereo wrote:

"consort :
true. auto-revert will not work
but of course the edit was incorrect."

thanks, at least i shows "needs major changes" now on release page.

silverleaf wrote:

Same person as previously mentioned. I don't think this person understands me.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1659572 Would someone else like to see if they might have better luck?

consort wrote:

I don't think that person understands anyone or anything at all, silverleaf ...
a very unlucky, unpleasant and inauspicious vacuum seems to accompany him.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?label=Pool+(2)#latest

Pool as label or series of Bungalow ?

thx.

fleshmeatdoll wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/166684

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=364794#latest

8m2stereo wrote:

ok, thanks,

but the page still needs some votes to go "Correct" ..

http://www.discogs.com/history?label=Pool+(2)#latest

Internaut wrote:

Please help vote this user deep into the CIP list before he can submit more crap into the database: http://www.discogs.com/user/progmusic70s

8m2stereo wrote:

i suggest sending all those back to his drafts folder
as soon as he has been stopped by CIP tomorrow.

*_*

8m2stereo wrote:

/snip/

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=MichaelNRW2

Everything needs looking into, repeated mistakes, possibly wrong labels etc. I went through some but there's just too many...

rassel wrote:

OMG, let's put him in the CIP for the sake of this Database.
Your votes are needed, now.