Internaut wrote:

This user could use a little bit of guidance: brj7

consort wrote:

New York Style Records and dj.madman2020

8m2stereo wrote:

^^ = spam, i've told nik.

http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?artist=DJ+Hans+(2)
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?artist=DJ+No+Show

consort wrote:

mammamaria

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Kerry247

last seen a month ago,
on CIP since 17 days, no replies whatsoever, no fixes,

major links mess: wrong labels and artists,
and all tracklistings non-standard ..
i put most up to be sent
back to his drafts please, thx.

8m2stereo wrote:

on CIP as of today,
just PMd me that he got the 50 mails now and is willing to fix

8m2stereo wrote:

copy-to-draft add-promo websubmission,
as 300+ (thankfully most of them got removed meanwhile) others from this user ...
http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=getmusic

i put them all up for removal as both moodytrax nor me
got any replies,
subber last seen 4 months ago,
very few have more than 0/1 owners ..

TechElec wrote:

dkblair needs help, seems to be non-repsonsive though.

silverleaf wrote:

Would someone please have a crack at this http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1659572

Also, please let me know if you think I've slipped up somewhere in my reasoning. Thanks.

8m2stereo wrote:

^^
this part is great:
'If you have some doubts, i can make to see you
and to listen to the record in chat with SKYPE or MSN.'

SmotheredHope wrote:

Hmm, I recognize the style in that submission... is it our medley guy from Italy again who has appeared with different usernames (due to CIP) throughout the past year or so?

silverleaf wrote:

I think all of this guys subs are poor and it's always the same group of 4 that have/want the items.

consort wrote:

group of 1, lol, with 2-3 dozen user accounts so far.

8m2stereo wrote:

deleted.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history...D+Productions#latest

TechElec wrote:

They've got 4 labels under them, what's the problem?

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submiss...r=sunsetdistribution

Keeps adding records with an alarming rate and not caring about any votes. Some of these records seem pretty questionable too...

TechElec wrote:

I've done random background checks on a few and they exist, he's very, very sloppy though.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Yeah, but I'm guessing a majority of them are unofficial releases.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=thepope

User "has no time" to fix submissions, yet finds time to submit new ones... ?

jape wrote:

Suspicious guy submitting stuff by himself:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=mrbeandj

consort wrote:

same pattern, same spam, this time MR. Bean Records-related.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.myspace.com/raindancerob ?

Jayfive wrote:

Yeah, thats more than likely Rob again the gibbering psycho. Ive informed nik.

Meanwhile, heres a newbie whos got to grips with most things but might need a bit of help:
http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=Hradesin

Jayfive wrote:

Ok, the mrbeandj account is closed, ill put all the subs up for removal.

Mr.Mystery wrote:

I'm suspecting this person is a websumitter based on his comments, but I'm not 100% sure. Can someone else take a look before I start the removals?

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=my_revenge

TechElec wrote:

Doesn't respond to request for runout etchings an unable to add credits...

nausicaa01 wrote:

need vote

http://www.discogs.com/artist/James+Becht

thanks

lol wrote:

somebody please take a look at him
sry I don't have much patience for users who doesn't even try to read quick start guide

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=jade303

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=psu

Constant and intentional ignoring of capitalization guidelines and comments.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Need another NMC here

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1740046#latest

Fantasmagor wrote:

User thinks images of the cover in a plastic(factory) wrap are better then without, and keeps replacing 600x600 images for smaller ones because he believes they are "closer" to the original then the actual scanned ones. I won't get into a true-false discussion with him, so if some of you can have a look and back me or even him up, then this is solved and everybody can continue our vinyl passion :)

Tangerine Dream - Ricochet

Thanks...:)

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1693325

sorry, now
subber suddenly reappeared to fix it,
pls vote NO so it gets unlocked quickly,
thx.

/ done. thx.

silverleaf wrote:

Fantasmagor, your images of Ricochet are certainly better. There's a little difference on the 2 back cover scans. Upper left corner on yours has a 'decorative' boxed area that's not on the smaller scan. I just emailed the OS to ask him to comment on things and check his copy for that difference. One is of a different pressing?

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=keithjars

this guy keep resubbing items, changing around artist names on them, med up formats ect. without any proof of existance and availability whatssoever ..

his newest comments say: " .. pressing on CDR DIGITAL and 12" soon !"

the "label" is a myspace linking to the label page which shows nothing but a start pic ..

i-ve put them up for removal again, all have 0 owners bur subber,
maybe someone french can have a clarifying PM with him about what cogs is meant to be .. thx.

consort wrote:

^^^ please remove all pending keithjars stuff - none of it exists. even the items submitted/approved 2 years ago on his label Quadrant Recordings look totally fake.

Also:

http://www.discogs.com/label/Dark+Trax

has elaborate evidence on Last.FM and yout00b but smells like spam. What do others think?

Jayfive wrote:

Bedroom producer deluding himself. Google provides nothing except the tracks on youtube and last.fm.

A few of the tracks appear to be collaborations between forum members.

But generally I dont class these as eligible for discogs.

8m2stereo wrote:

.. all up for removal,

someone needs to look into the other "Quadrant Recordings" items,
some claim to have 2 to 5 owners ..
thx.

swagski wrote:

schtel wrote this 6 months ago- spotted it today at http://www.discogs.com/help/fo...topic/172074?page=1;
----------------
This is a little bit of a mess. I can't think straight right now. But...

Buddah Records
Buddha Records - notice slightly different spelling
Buddha Records (2)
Buddha Records (3) needs to be removed.
Buddha Records (4) probably the same here.

^ Look What They Done To My Song Ma. :P

I'll get back to this if someone doesn't update them first.
---------------------
Do these additions help?

Buddah Records
Buddha Records

Old Buddah stuff & Kama Sutra will emerge under Buddha through Legacy. Typically, on their site, someone's fudged the issue by spelling it Budda... or maybe that's a rename?

Dimple wrote:

SillyKees has changed this: Orchestral Manoeuvres In The Dark - Dazzle Ships into a completely different edition, almost exactly this: OMD* - Dazzle Ships
From the beginning it was a Dutch release from 1991, he kept adding the images from the UK edition from 1997 and now he has changed the release year and notes on the first edition mentioned, so that it is exactly the same as the second (He hasn't changed country from Netherlands to UK even if he has MCPS in the notes).
I removed his images twice but he kept adding them again, and now someone has voted the whole thing correct.
Does anyone in this forum own the Dutch 1991 release? If so, please add the images from that and change the release back again. Without images he will keep changing it over and over again.

rassel wrote:

LOL
This is a funny label with vinyl records without center whole, digital CDs (upps, will have to check if I have analog CDs @home), and pretty funny artwork (Photoshop is able to create better fakes than this!).

SmotheredHope wrote:

nvm, edited / voted myself

consort wrote:

ahem, totally.

silverleaf wrote:

Dimple, I think you're quite right on that sub, so I just commented & voted on it. Sorry if I got anything wrong.
I thought it would revert, but I guess the Correct vote prevented it. http://www.discogs.com/history?release=179849

Anyone else want to have a look, comment or vote?

mjb wrote:

Another copy-to-draft, add-promo ... no idea if it's websubs or what. I sent a PM just now to warn him that he's going to get bad votes if those submissions aren't better explained. I also tried to inform him about the proper use of the White Label tag, and which kind of promos can't be submitted separately. Wait a few days and see what happens I guess...

Update: he replied privately and said most of them are unmarked white labels, but a few test pressings. He said he'll make some updates.

8m2stereo wrote:

here-s a seller who has decided to toally ignore any moderation, caps warnings, credit role warnings ect., but decides to wisecrack on other-s subs, even adding sales relevant version info to notes ..
i-ve been through all, and PMed him, others have also tried their luck already, to no avail .. he needs a last proper 'heads up!' imho,
minor votes will not keep him from becoming a voter though ..

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=TranSounds

/snip

BeatSensor wrote:

DAHOF wrote:

I READ THIS:

Error:
Cannot update this artist because it has no releases voted as Correct. Please see http://www.discogs.com/help/contributing.html

Something can help me please??

www.discogs.com/Dj-PukPlasticbox-Jade-Straight-Up-Your-Gum/release/1737629

SmotheredHope wrote:

Does somebody understand what this guy is trying to say?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=911158#latest

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Nobody knows what the hell he's doing or trying to say.

consort wrote:

best.comment.today

sorry, don't mean to poke fun, but that was kind of epic. this user has told me in pm




Although there's certainly a language barrier, I don't feel that I misunderstood an attempted bribe. my apologies if it's against TOS to copy/paste PMs to public.

all the items on that label are highly dubious imo. they exist nowhere online except here, myspace, facebook. no evidence has really been given for any of them and more often than not, the word "soon" is used as a promise of a release's eventual existence. the images certainly seem to be straight off a PC graphics program.

8m2stereo wrote:

well, as he also told us 'I am into full adhesion on the shop online (beatpoet)',
and, considering he has been promising the promising artist's releases with ever changing names, cat#, pics ect. for ages now
i would wish for some frenchman to have a final word with him,
or we'll be stuck with him forever. to quote
'mizukagami : I can reject this as many times as you can submit. (over 2 years ago)' ..

snip/
the odyssey continues: just received per commentless PM fom him
http://www.djtunes.com/label/q...-recordings/releases

Internaut wrote:

What to do with this user atomicgr ; he keeps submitting with notes that are highly irrelevant, and does not respond at all to votes/comments..

DAHOF wrote:

It's ok???
www.discogs.com/Dj-PukPlasticbox-Jade-Straight-Up-Your-Gum/release/1737629

marcelrecords wrote:

I left a few too now, we'll see if he follows them up...

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/Glavnye...atal/release/1766078

Someone tell me what the diddly is going on in there...

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=ukrmedia

i've just now sent him to CIP, which will only kick in tomorrow unfortunately,
he's still going stong, so someone please mark up all the ones i didn't yet,
most labels seem to be wrong, and that's only for a start, but yet def. NeedMajorChanges ..
thx.

SmotheredHope wrote:

What a pile of garbage submissions...

8m2stereo wrote:

just sent this to nik:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=ukrmedia

i simply can't believe that every weekend at least one of these guys shows up,
or finally gets identified, we have to hunt his crap down single handed
and then we have to wait 24 hours for the CIP to kick in ..
what a waste of resources, an that with 500.000 waiting subs ..
sub. limit for newbies needs to come back,
and CIP need to somehow be modified to kick in much sooner ..
and some kind of 'panic button' should be installed ..

thx., 8

SmotheredHope wrote:

Thanks 8, good initiative. I agree with you about that the CIP cycle should be run more often.

Nice haircut though in this awesome sub

http://www.discogs.com/Gold-Uk...obul/release/1766291

(by the way, all images are marked with his username)

SmotheredHope wrote:

I put 4 up for removal that were so riddled with errors it made me sick. Also interesting to note is that none of the stuff he submits has a cat#, all are "none" despite the fact that they're supposedly factory pressed CDs.

Internaut wrote:

Both ukrmedia and atomicgr have documented today that the CIP feature does not work satisfactory..

Se-BusT-eL wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=830425
EI, please
thanks

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1327920

8m2stereo wrote:

/snip, done.

consort wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1762624#latest
^^ more imaginary Quadrant Recordings fantasy ...

related (my benefit of doubt for this user is exhausted):
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1762550#latest

Mr.Mystery wrote:

Someone might want to go through these:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=leonardfell

Submitted nearly 100 releases in a couple of days, all of which are copy-to-draft white labels/promos and none of them seem to be in his collection. Might be legit too but seems a bit fishy.

consort wrote:

known good submitter but what in the world is this!?!!?!
Jealousy (2) - Behind Its Time

the label is an image file on the internet? http://rostock.homestead.com/files/butcher.gif

Internaut wrote:

The sub history explains it quiet well.

muntz wrote:

my original submission, but the edits aren't correct imo:
A Musical Anthology Of The Orient: India II

Kepe wrote:

YES votes needed to finally remove these 2 clear duplicates that have been pending almost month already:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1436777#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1529729#latest

Thanks!

consort wrote:

yes, sorry. weird though :/

rile3e wrote:

can some one help finish this off please? http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1666907#latest

Dr.SultanAszazin wrote:

Please read the topic regarding field-recordings I started recently for arguments on the main artist: http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/187866

Regarding the IMC in the credits: have followed your and taalem's advice.
But read the the following topic on companies too (still in discussion there): http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/186238

(the Traditional-unknown artist issue has been solved already, didn't think about the fact Traditional is a Writer's credit, stupid me)

(Other things on which you disagree? Tell me, the more (reasonable) opinions there are, the better:), now it should be correct? Tell me...

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/label/040+Recordings
put almost all up for removal,
all but 2 subbed by label,
no owners, no reply to justified moderations within one month,
all with format mess, some artist messes, no times (a must for files),
back to his drafts please,

thx.

silverleaf wrote:

"Country: UK, Europe & US" http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1586262
Is this a valid distribution zone? Overly broad?

SmotheredHope wrote:

I almost used UK, Europe & US on one submission (or edit rather) which had a very broad distribution zone, except US was not part of it (Canada though), check it out (distribution info in notes):
http://www.discogs.com/Tiamat-...umber/release/422069 - I had to go for UK & Europe despite that there's distribution info for all over the world, US not included though so.

silverleaf wrote:

SmotheredHope, that was informative. Thanks!

If you've got time would you please have a look here? http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1218264
I would appreciate your feedback, even if it's to say that I'm wrong.
When I found these edits, all with the same uninformative note of "Different Paul London." I voted a NMiC on all and asked for source of the info. I have no problem with his being absolutely correct about it. I do have a problem with someone feeling 'because I know it' is enough and a request to justify it is beneath them.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/artist/DJ+Charlie+(4)
sorry, too tired for this ..

lol wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=kabelton



as above

SmotheredHope wrote:

You're absolutely right, an explanation should have been included in the edit, then there would have been no more questions raised.

Mop66 wrote:

Accidentally voted this correct while it isn't: Ken Hensley - In The Morning / Who Will Sing For You.
Myabe one more NmC vote to get it back on track, thanks.

8m2stereo wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/submissions?user=MichaelNRW2
10 / 44 items i put up for for 'back to drafts',
still not on cip, so 'minor' votes will be of no help here ..
thx.

SmotheredHope wrote:

Why isn't he on the CIP?
Average Vote Received: Needs Major Changes (2.36, 171 votes)

8m2stereo wrote:

maybe because we, quite recently, were, in a similar case,
strongly advised 'not to hack the system' by votes 'n stuff ..
which actually for me was the beginning of my quitting
to clean up other people's mess here.

djindio wrote:

never mind...
-

consort wrote:

I missed this; please, to what do you refer?

DAHOF wrote:

Vote this please
http://www.discogs.com/Dj-Puk-...-Gum/release/1737629
Thx

Internaut wrote:

How on earth is DAVIDBRUNNER able to submit again?

marcelrecords wrote:

The heading of this thread reads:
''Requests for votes on other users submissions''

8m2stereo wrote:

just one of the reasons why i today deleted my ca. 500 'saved' subs ..
all were moderations by myself or 'votes' requesting fixes
(incl. quite a number on wrongly voted 'C' or 'C&C'),
to no avail whatsoever.

djindio wrote:

vote please:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=99205#latest

if anything to add to the already too long of a discussion above, please comment here instead:
http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/188303

thanks.

eiki wrote:

Hi, removal request for a double post with a basic mistype cat#, corrected an updated already.

http://www.discogs.com/DJ-Shad...Days/release/1771475

Thanks a lot

eiki wrote:

thanks guys

silverleaf wrote:

Would someone else like to weigh in on the removal of Notes? http://www.discogs.com/history?release=154771

Edit: Situation had good resolution. Thanks to all.

consort wrote:

C&C + NMaC = Correct
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1574359#latest

lynxtuft wrote:

I am having an issue with another person who didn't submit to a release. After I made just one change this person voted in a completely inappropriate way and I believe their reason for voting is wrong as well.

Would somebody please take a read of the history of updates at the following listing. I may be wrong, but please consider my intentions, my understanding of the rule, the evidence I've cited, versus their actions, name calling, and refusal to amend their vote.

Francisco López - Addy En El País De Las Frutas Y Los Chunches

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1371260

legumes-SALES wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1269992

please vote EIntirely Incorrect.

the user introduces icnorrect capitalisation and ruins the originally perfect credits.

jweijde wrote:

He has now been banned.