nik wrote:

This thread is to request advice or votes on remove release requests.

Always check the guidelines to make sure the removal is valid http://www.discogs.com/help/su...-remove-release.html

Please do not remove releases unless you are 100% sure it is not valid for the database.

In order for a release to be eligible for removal, it should be non-existent, so badly entered as to be unable to be identified as a unique release, or a duplicate.

mawiles wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1166972#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1633612#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=540056#latest

Curiopete wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1575526#latest

eiki wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/sell/li...ase_id=1916633&ev=rb

Item submitted only for sale, and not declared as owned.

grondeekhoorn wrote:

If he had the original release by hand when he submitted it, there is no problem.
Because he/she is selling the item, it is probably not added to the collection list.
Maybe ask submitter about country and release date?

jweijde wrote:

Please vote ('Yes') on this one:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=603651#latest

Myriad wrote:

Yes on this please:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1916989

julesparis wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1916824#latest
thanks much!

z-music wrote:

[Invalid Release]
info taken from:
http://www.amazon.fr/Everybody...id=1252609380&sr=8-1

I don't believe submitter had ever copy in hand. Cat nr is Amazon's ASIN. No idea where from is Universal Licensing Music (ULM) in this sub ... New Crazy Frog is released by Sony's label PlayOn ...

infamous31 wrote:

Prodigy - Return Of The Mac

The first submitter entered the release using the barcode as the catalog number:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=947230

No one caught the error, so someone else entered the same release under the correct catalog number:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1024733

[edit] Sorry...just realized that the two versions are different. Never mind...

Electro-Magnetic wrote:

Duplicate release to be removed: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1666972#latest

Even the original submitter would like this removed (see comments in history). Thanks.

Electro-Magnetic wrote:

Thanks for voting on the above release guys. It's now removed, though strangely the link still appears on the artist page?!: http://www.discogs.com/artist/Gordon+Giltrap

Hopefully this will disappear soon...

-Ik- wrote:

dupe: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1675836#latest

aemjae wrote:

Could someone please give this a "Entirely Incorrect" vote!
Made a mistake while entering the W/L version :-(

http://www.discogs.com/Jackmat...ack-EP/release/38532


/aemjae

comkai wrote:

^ reverted.
wrong topic btw ; )
v here's the appropriate one: Forum Topic #172073

aemjae wrote:

Thanks!

Oh, my bad. Where should I have posted it instead?


/aemjae
 

julesparis wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1926589#latest

thanks!

Myriad wrote:

Yes on this please:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1904918

Thanks!

ahlbomper wrote:

votes needed on this duplicate:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1696958#latest

0frg wrote:

please vote No to this removal request (it's my own !)
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1492549#latest
thought it was a duplicate of another entry but there's a slight difference.
thanks :)

R.de.Graaf wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1594449#latest

Thanks

kaizoku wrote:

please vote for remove on

http://www.discogs.com/Kaizoku...ting/release/1931207

I added this to Discogs but the track is going to be released on a different label later this year...

cvalda44 wrote:

Please check this absolutely nonsense release removal:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1932148#latest
selected by chrisbaerchen, a person who submitted 470 releases and has a good rating.

This person, chrisbaerchen, selected for removal:
a) without reading the discussion (he could see about other label)
b) without checking the pictures (the artwork is absolutely different)
I just do not understand, how possible to have such devil-may-care attitude to database.

pyenapple wrote:

Please remove this one I added accidentally. I looked for the release before I submitted, but couldn't find it. Then after I added this one, suddenly there were two. A ghost! In any case, my new one is a duplicate, obviously. Please, please remove. :)

http://www.discogs.com/Make-Up...ever/release/1932464

Thank yoooooou!

Kellryan

julesparis wrote:

please No vote this nonsense removal request http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1401785#latest

user requesting such removals could perhaps do with a few words from management too.

rassel wrote:

Not 100% sure, but I think these two are dupes:
http://www.discogs.com/Bassoma...tions/release/879058
http://www.discogs.com/Bass-O-...ions/release/1201093
Agreed?

rile3e wrote:

Needs a removal vote please http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1908230#latest

ahlbomper wrote:

have a look at this:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1631247#latest
"i don't have this. photo taken from elsewhere"

this http://www.discogs.com/history?release=117029#latest is in the database and has been marked as a promo for more than 3 years.

EDIT: now i have just submitted this http://www.discogs.com/release/1933694 which has a 4:10 A-side like the web-sub. which *tracklist* is a mix of the 1 i just submitted and this http://www.discogs.com/history?release=117029#latest

EDIT: or rather *durations*

muntz wrote:

there is no other version of Cantofabule, except the repress http://www.discogs.com/release/917264
Cantofabule is a duplicate and has to be removed
thank you

zin wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1909479#latest

this release already exists in the database

ahlbomper wrote:

(slightly off topic) super thread. obvious simple improvement to this site i think.
NO 1, more wrong releases will be removed quicker before users get to attached to them.

i forgot who suggested this ?
(maybe short answer, or just back to business in this thread)

danperry0 wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/Mick-Ka...tles/release/1935174 needs to be removed. i tried removing it from the "edit release" page but it said it needs 4 votes from owners and contributors... and i just added it. ...incorrectly, i might add, which is why i need it removed. i didn't know how to properly link it to a master release when i did it the first time.. and didn't notice before i submitted it that it wasn't linked.
all apologies, it's only my 6th submission, i think ;)

jape wrote:

Please some NO-votes for this removal:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1921374#latest

it was originally a web submission, but the CD has been released now so it can be updated. However the removal is still pending so I can't update it with the correct cat# etc.

jweijde wrote:

Need 'No' votes here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1412698#latest

and 'Yes' votes here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923237#latest

w_ellis wrote:

Request for more 'No' votes on this, as it's not duplicating any of the other versions:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1890073#latest

Myriad wrote:

Could I please have Yes votes of this:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1217542

Thanks!

skutchy wrote:

Can we get a couple of final removal votes on this duplicate please?

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1932096

Thanks.

ahlbomper wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1935174#latest
6 yes. 2 no.
shouldn't that be enough to remove it (6 - 2 = 4, or is it just me)

infamous31 wrote:

Request for removal of Colors soundtrack:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=712322#latest

It's a duplicate of

http://www.discogs.com/Various...track/release/176616

Catalog number as noted by submitter for 712322 was 9 25713-1 -- that's the cat# for the album sleeve. The vinyl label is 1-25713. This is exactly the same as the original already in the database.

skutchy wrote:

can somesone start a removal request for this: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1642390#latest as it is obviously totally wrong & hugely incomplete and the submitter vanished 7 months ago - I can't do it as I already voted Needs major changes 4 months ago.

Thanks.

ahlbomper wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=898787#latest
duplicate of
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=539804#latest

hafler3o wrote:

3 matrix variants of the release 'Trout Mask Replica'

as discussed in the thread http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/196210

up for removal:
Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band* - Trout Mask Replica
Captain Beefheart And His Magic Band - Trout Mask Replica
Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band* - Trout Mask Replica

infamous31 wrote:

Request for removal of the Clonious' "Adroit Adventures":

http://www.discogs.com/Cloniou...ures/release/1826747

Duplicate of:

http://www.discogs.com/Clonius...ures/release/1808068

rile3e wrote:

Need a removal vote or two here please http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1293456#latest

Curiopete wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1814800#latest

rassel wrote:

This release here, Barbara Norris - Heavy Hitter, added four years ago, got the wrong pictures, two years ago. Due to this, it was tranformed in another version, with just United Performers as label and a different B-Side.

In the meantime, this release Barbara Norris - Heavy Hitter was subbed with the "correct" pictures of the above release.

We have cleared the situation and reverted the first release (Barbara Norris - Heavy Hitter) to what it was four years ago, added a new release with just one label, Barbara Norris - Heavy Hitter and a different B-Side.

So this one is now a dupe and up for removal:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1606305#latest


Thanks for your votes.

Edit: Done, thank you 4 your votes.

Jayfive wrote:

Can I have some NO votes for these removals please:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923115#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923204#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923215#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923217#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923233#latest
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1923235#latest

Labelowner seems to think that because the label has changed distributor and no longer has these release for sale or distribution, that they should no longer be documented in discogs. Or something.

Either way, please stop him. Apart from anything I spent ages fixing all the errors in this dickhead's submissions and ill be damned if by way of gratitude he takes most of them down

infamous31 wrote:

Duplicates of the Simply Vinyl reissue of Jay-Z's "Reasonable Doubt." Here's the original submission:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=321330#latest

And here's the duplicate. Note that it erroneously lists the label as Roc-A-Fella Records, and the country as U.S. The tell-tale signs are the catalog numbers and the "limited-edition 10."

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1443538

Myriad wrote:

Yes votes here please:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1462439

Thanks in advance!

julesparis wrote:

nevermind - i think this one's here for the long ride.

Kergillian wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1827497#latest

Scans and info identical to the US version. I'm not sure there ever WAS a UK version of this. All versions have a UK address for A.T. and a Texas address for Subterranean, afaik...

jweijde wrote:

is this a valid entry:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1738817#latest
looks like some Comedy DVD

z-music wrote:

Aren't they duplicates?
Don't Leave Me and Don't Leave Me
Return Of The Mack and Return Of The Mack

jweijde wrote:

I need some 'No' votes here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1274678#latest
The submitter had a copy at the time he submitted it.

plazzTT wrote:

I should have included this bonus CD: Memory Tapes - Seek Magic CD2

in here Memory Tapes - Seek Magic (I have entered it here now) instead of a separate entry.

So the separate bonus CD entry should be removed Memory Tapes - Seek Magic CD2

DakotaThrice wrote:

Can somebody vote for the removal of the three releases on the Callsign Media page.

This was a label that I was involved with but it fell apart before any of these releases were actualy released.

Thanks.

pyenapple wrote:

This one needs removal, it's a poorly-added duplicate:

http://www.discogs.com/Digital...-Funky/release/19161

Axefield wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1226129#latest DUPLICATE

z-music wrote:

seems like it's the same release

Go Deep and Go Deep

shall we remove Go Deep (which was added later) and update Go Deep?

danperry0 wrote:

need removal votes for http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1955186#latest
thanks.

jweijde wrote:

Bunch of 'No' votes needed here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1196608#latest

Chamleon wrote:

pls vote NO here: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=178409#latest

reason: paradine added the cat# of this release to the other one (of another label), selected the release for removal with comment: fixed label affiliations, the other page states both. this one is now faulty and pointless to have listed as the other one is ready to go, and correct.

unfortunately when i will post a comment resp. will vote No, nothing happend...

He did the same here: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1082063#latest

pls also vote NO here.

Axefield wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1527997#latest
Duplicate.

suono_di_stiletto wrote:

please vote to remove the following release:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1455804#latest

as i said in the removal request, the original submission was fully based on speculation. The first argument for the submission was the lack of a catalogue number, which the submitter found strange. Second argument was that the submitter couldnt believe the original copies didnt sell out.

1. the orginal vinyl is exactly the same as the cllaimed reissue, so yes there is NO catalogue nr. to be found on the vinyl.
2. this was a self release and the sleeveless overstock was sold by the original artists. There are many examples of artists that are selling their sleeveless overstock, i already named two examples in the request.
3. the (wife of) the original artist has confirmed there is no such thing as a reissue. The link mentioned by the submitter (where he bought his copy) is the link to a shop run by the wife of one of the members of the band

Furthermore i found it astonishing that a submission gets approved on such debatable hypothetical grounds in the first place!

thanks all

Kergillian wrote:

SO, if the original pressing is limited to 1000 copies, and there are more than 1000 copies pressed, and the excess are released in a generic sleeve - is it not important to denote this with separate versions...?

I would suggest removing Repress (especially as there is no evidence anywhere that this is true) and note that these are excess copies released in a generic sleeve, outside of the limited 1000 copies pressed with picture sleeves...

AbsoluteBodyControl wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1914503#latest

AbsoluteBodyControl wrote:

Another one: http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1732178#latest

bojank wrote:

Please vote YES here:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1962913#latest

Regards, Bojan.

bojank wrote:

Please vote YES here:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1962913#latest

Regards, Bojan.

ApeAstbury wrote:

The person that requested this to be removed has no clue how discogs works.
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1856519#latest

Please vote accordingly and leave as many helpful comments for him as possible.
Thanks

Myriad wrote:

Could I please have Yes votes here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1968532#latest
Thanks!

sanberg101 wrote:

Look at this one:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1333478#latest

I would vote yes, but please someone else look at it before.
Very interesting is voting there:
* royb0t - Needs Minor Changes (about 1 year ago)
* frodekommode - Needs Minor Changes (about 1 year ago)
* eskolaah - Needs Major Changes (about 1 year ago)
* Nostradamus7 - Complete and Correct (4 months ago)

Nostradamus is the original submitter and the whole sub looks like a websub....

hmvh wrote:

13 members want this:
• assassinrotterdam
• atomic79
• Catcore
• DeadbeatDHC
• Desolated
• drift-bp
• FFF
• Nostradamus7
• rutzler
• stonehigh
• 3 private

Suspicious indeed and by no means C+C.

Cossie_Lee wrote:

Hi, can anyone vote for removal of my release, should have used ANV
http://www.discogs.com/Driza-B...Love/release/1971776
thanks, I'll use ANV once removed

Lee

legumes-SALES wrote:

Gabba Front Berlin - Halo

confirmed by the artist: this is a preview for a 12", not a release on its own.


it's like a preview from juno.co.uk and not a valid release entry.


Please remove this.
(can't request this myself)

loukash wrote:

Rather "No" than "Yes" here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1614599#latest
(It solves the problem either way, but please read my last comment there!)

muntz wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1854300#latest
thanks

Mr.Mystery wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1983372#latest
Voted No by accident, please vote it out.

hafler3o wrote:

My contribution found to be a duplicate, confirmed by other submitter, easy stuff ! Love And The Russian Winter NOW DELETED thanks all;

pyenapple wrote:

I would like to suggest these two Kate Bush releases for removal based on the fact that they are part of a larger release (the Kate Bush "This Woman's Work" Box Set) and do not exist independently outside of that release.

http://www.discogs.com/release/1434024
http://www.discogs.com/release/1434020

THEY'VE BEEN REMOVED. Thanks everyone!

julesparis wrote:

please NO vote this nonsense removal request:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1622891#latest


also management may want to have a word with this user requesting such removals

thanks

Electro-Magnetic wrote:

An interesting one...

Quite a while ago now a consensus was reached that Entity, The (2) - Pink Bits was a duplicate of Entity, The (2) - Carbon Based Energy.

Other users have previously indicated that the catalog number AQUA 22 was partially scratched out and changed into AQUA 21, causing the confusion of this release being submitted twice under two different catalog numbers.

Unfortunately the submitter and owners of the duplicate are now inactive on Discogs it appears.

Any comments and assistance on the below removal will be much appreciated!

Entity, The (2) - Pink Bits
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=40303#latest

At the very least it should be flagged somehow.

Thanks!

Edit: I have also again contacted every user who owns these releases and pointed them to the removed release for their input and confirmation.

AbsoluteBodyControl wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1305869#latest

muntz wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/release/1602119 is the same as http://www.discogs.com/release/1054952 which was incorrectly edited

jweijde wrote:

Yes votes needed here:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1551776#latest

ApeAstbury wrote:

Please see for yourself, and thank you
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1992195#latest

How can we put a stop to web-submissions?

MoXoBuK wrote:

Release removed but still appears on the label page
http://www.discogs.com/Quivver...ixes/release/1215505

label:
http://www.discogs.com/label/BozBoz

(i believe there was a special thread for reporting problem releases, haven't found it, wouldn't mind to have a link)

Thanks

Electro-Magnetic wrote:

Happened to me before too. Apparently the servers need to catch up.

In my experience the release should be removed from the label page after about one or two weeks.

seppuku wrote:

EDIT: Sorted, thanks.

djindio wrote:

removing websub:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1976837#latest

comkai wrote:

i actually can't imagine Audion & Aki Latvamäki - Cocoon Compilation G - Side G - Fire / Tämä Tuli Järvestä
was released seperately. to me it looks more like some greedy record dealer broke up the box set.
anyone around with deeper knowledge ?

Curiopete wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1809741#latest

consort wrote:

Einstürzende Neubauten - Footnotes / Bonus Tracks needs to be removed as it came from a 4 x CD set

Somehow, the set has only yesterday been submitted (!?) but it's a major mess so far: Einstürzende Neubauten - Tri-Set [Box Set]

So, at this point, the info @ Einstürzende Neubauten - Footnotes / Bonus Tracks exists only there, even though the submission is invalid for inclusion.

hmvh wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=760978#latest

loukash wrote:

Please vote NO:
http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1962111
(no valid reason for a removal)

hmvh wrote:

Some random mix available on Rapidshare:
http://www.discogs.com/Platten...FSAC/release/1992511

mawiles wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1944494

sanberg101 wrote:

Removed!

Thanks!

thefoureyedfox wrote:

Opinions on this would be appreciated:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1957999

Thanks. :}

ApeAstbury wrote:

http://www.discogs.com/history?release=1455422&rev=2
comments if you feel like it
Thanks