Tony G (5) ‎– Simple Dreams

Genre:
Style:
Year:

Tracklist

Simple Dreams (Young Marco Remix) 6:28
Simple Dreams (Original Mix) 5:25
Simple Dreams (Pink Skull Remix) 6:22

Versions (2)

Cat# Artist Title (Format) Label Cat# Country Year
INFINITE JUJU 001 Tony G (5) Simple Dreams(12", Ltd) Infinite Juju INFINITE JUJU 001 US 2013 Sell This Version
INFINITE JUJU 001 Tony G (5) Simple Dreams(12", RP, W/Lbl) Infinite Juju INFINITE JUJU 001 Netherlands 2014 Sell This Version

Recommendations

Reviews Show All 8 Reviews

Add Review

panpavel

panpavel

June 8, 2015
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", Ltd, INFINITE JUJU 001
all three versions are stunning, label should really give some repress a chance :)
azaro

azaro

January 30, 2015
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", RP, W/Lbl, INFINITE JUJU 001
young marco remix of epic dreams is awesome!!
whatspoppin999

whatspoppin999

August 26, 2014
edited over 2 years ago
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", RP, W/Lbl, INFINITE JUJU 001
#sigh global & digital
tony_g_philly

tony_g_philly

March 25, 2014
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", Ltd, INFINITE JUJU 001
Chris1972 - the label originally did not want to repress. there was a lot of pressure from distribution outlets for a repress due to so much demand for the young marco remix. rush hour pleaded to pay for a repress and finally the label caved. i'm sorry that you feel slighted, but this was not a premeditated promo trick. we had no idea that this would take off like it did. on the bright side, the original press seems to be worth much more than the white label repress. again i apologize that you do not feel satisfied with the handling of the release.
Chris1972

Chris1972

January 23, 2014
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", RP, W/Lbl, INFINITE JUJU 001
The press release that came with the original pressing said '99 copies - NO REPRESS' !!!

No problem with it being repressed but why say that to start out with if it's not the case? 
It just feels like people are being drawn in under false pretences. I can see what the label
are trying to do (e.g. have a ridiculously low initial pressing, in this case 99 copies, create underground
hype/buzz in order to sell more copies with a larger, second pressing) but ethically and morally
it doesn't feel right especially for those punters who paid over the odds getting the limited original pressing
shipped overseas. I should have waited another 6 months and got the repress from Juno!

Shame as the music's great...Just the promotion of it is wrong...

Chris1972

Chris1972

January 23, 2014
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", Ltd, INFINITE JUJU 001

The press release that came with the original pressing said '99 copies - NO REPRESS' !!!

No problem with it being repressed but why say that to start out with if it's not the case?
It just feels like people are being drawn in under false pretences. I can see what the label
are trying to do (e.g. have a ridiculously low initial pressing, in this case 99 copies, create underground
hype/buzz in order to sell more copies with a larger, second pressing) but ethically and morally
it doesn't feel right especially for those punters who paid over the odds getting the limited original pressing
shipped overseas. I should have waited another 6 months and got the repress from Juno!

Shame as the music's great...Just the promotion of it is wrong...
Panoramarecords

Panoramarecords

January 22, 2014
edited over 2 years ago
referencing Simple Dreams, 12", Ltd, INFINITE JUJU 001

Repress on the way ! WTF