Tool (2) ‎– 10,000 Days

Disk 1 plays flawlessly. Disk 2 side C is good, but side D has a brief instance of regular clicking during Right in Two. There looks to be a blemish on the record there. Pretty sweet sounding bootleg though.

I feel like the vocals are extremely quiet and the bass is extremely overpowered. Looks good, no complaints aesthetically, except that it is a simple barebones sleeve, I just can't really listen to this like I like to listen to Tool, super loud, because his voice is drowned out and I have to turn the bass to negative just to enjoy it.

as long as no official release on vinyl exists, the only way to obtain this album on vinyl is by buying a bootleg. This one on blue marbled vinyl looks pretty decent but that is not the case when you play both records. The pressing is off on so many levels, it is clear that there was no quality control 'cause it starts with the surface noise, which is worse than a general picture disc. Then there's the fact that just like many recent official pressings especially from the US the hole doesn't seem to be in the middle which makes the music sound unbearable. It's like the whole thing went through a Kevin Shields' (My Bloody Valentine) whammy bar style before pressed on the wax. I am happy that I didn't pay a lot for this double LP, otherwise I would feel screwed. Be careful when buying this record on some market somewhere. You sure will feel disappointed.

does anyone know if this bootleg sounds any good? my local record store has it for sale and it has aroused my curiosity

I was lucky enough to get this release at a local store for a good price and it sounds absolutely awesome! I have been (re-)discovering this album recently on vinyl and I like it much more than I did back in the day on CD. Recommended if you can find it.

Strode420 is so right!
On my "TOOL SD 001" side two has a scratch at the beginning and side 3 has the first 10 minutes unlistenable static.
Don´t buy this!

This is a review to criticize Tool's aesthetic choice to add extraneous and clunky parenthetical addendum to the song titles "Wings For Marie (Pt. 1)" and "10,000 Days (Wings Pt. 2)." It looks really stupid and childish in print and I think cheapens the intent of the titles. I know its not a big deal to most people but I felt annoyed enough by it to express my distaste for it. If they really wanted to adhere to sequential numeration of verbal titles the logic insists that it would simply be "Wings For Marie Pt. 1" and "Wings For Marie Pt. 2" or "Wings For Marie I" and "Wings For Maire II" or "10,000 Days Pt. 1" and 10,000 Days Pt. 2" or "10,000 Days I" and 10,000 Days II" like so. They could have simply Named them "Wings For Marie" and "10,000 Days" respectively and left it at that. Anyone who listens to the songs will understand they go together without numeration in the titles but its their songs and they can do what they want. It still drives me nuts though.

Besides the usual (subtle) distortion picture discs tend to give your stereo this is ok.
The mix is a little heavy on the bass but this sounds ok. I'd give that a 7/10 in sound quality.

I have not heard the mass of other bootleg vinyls of this record but it sounds as good as the CD on my stereo and is not the same mix.

The vinyls are beautiful and heavy.

Tool is just being an ass with not pressing vinyl or not enough, thats why there are so many bootlegs around it's a huge gap in the market!

Mine came with both pieces red, but regardless of color - Don't buy this one!!!! (not that Discogs would let you anyway), pressing is extremely quiet, and the first 2-3 minutes of Side One and Side Three both have unlistenable static. Avoid the pressings with "TOOL SD 001" in the runout at all costs!!!!