Ad

Arctic MonkeysWhatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not

Genre:Rock
Style:Indie Rock
Year:

Tracklist

The View From The Afternoon3:38
I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor2:53
Fake Tales Of San Francisco2:56
Dancing Shoes2:22
You Probably Couldn't See For The Lights But You Were Staring Straight At Me2:10
Still Take You Home2:50
Riot Van2:12
Red Light Indicates Doors Are Secured2:22
Mardy Bum2:26
Perhaps Vampires Is A Bit Strong But..4:25
When The Sun Goes Down3:17
From The Ritz To The Rubble3:11
A Certain Romance5:27

Credits (9)

Notes

Winner of the 2006 Mercury Music Prize.

Versions

Filter by
    ? of 89 results
    Image, In Your Collection, Wantlist, or Inventory
    Version DetailsData Quality

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    • rabsi1's avatar
      rabsi1
      My copy has skipping issues on side A. Looks like a pressing defect. Shame.
      • wrtiede's avatar
        wrtiede
        I agree with other reviewers about this pressing sounding very clean.

        Mine has the same stamping and etching on the runout, but has no Made in Canada sticker and has the more normal larger Arctic Monkeys sticker on the shrinkwrap instead of the smaller version mentioned in the details of this release
        • modulok1984's avatar
          modulok1984
          Edited 4 months ago
          Buyers beware! There are A LOT of reissues listed for sale as first pressings. People don’t care or know how to properly check which pressing they have.

          First press: WIGLP 162 A-1 / WIGLP 162 B-1 stamped matrix numbers. If there are any additional letters or numbers whatsoever it's a later pressing. It’s as simple as that.

          Brand new/sealed copy = 99% guaranteed to be a reissue. This record is almost 20 years old and has been reissued multiple times. The sleeve, sticker, barcode etc looks exactly the same on a lot of pressings, checking the matrix numbers is the only way to know if you have a first press.
          • Rhyswk's avatar
            Rhyswk
            The record sounds so good for the price not a single click or pop
            • raphaelsterken's avatar
              It used to say this press was from 2018, now its an unknown year according to discogs. Does anyone have an idea what year this press is from?
              • BranJFlakes's avatar
                BranJFlakes
                Agree with the other comment that the record is extremely silent when it's supposed to be. When there is sound, it's honestly still a little quieter than my other records, but with the volume raised a bit (nothing unreasonable) it sounds just fine. Heard no pops or static at all even with the volume up.

                I love this album for the guitar runs, especially on the B side, and the guitars in particular are extremely clear and isolated. Great listen all around.
                • renegadeviking's avatar
                  Let me get this off my chest first: The Arctic Monkeys share exactly two common traits with The Beatles and Oasis - They're all British, and they're all rock bands. Let's end the comparisons there. No band will ever be the Beatles, and Oasis have two great albums while the Arctic Monkeys have only released one album to date, and its a totally different style and sound than Oasis. Comparisons to either of those bands are fruitless and unnecessary.

                  So what is this album then? Overhyped? Probably. But its most definitely a contender for album of the year. Why? This album takes everything that's good about the current crop of British bands (stop-start guitars, great hooks, catchy and danceable bass lines, great lyrics) and then turns it up to 11, so to speak. Lyrically, this band has the most in common with The Streets, replacing white-boy rapping and home-computer beats with extremely strong musicianship. What I like the most is that you can train your ear to listen to any of the parts of this band - the drumming is solid (far more so than say, Franz Ferdinand), each song is driven by terrific guitars and bass that will stay in your head as long as the lyrics will. THAT is what makes this album so impressive to me - the sum of its parts is stronger than any album I've heard in a long time.

                  Another point to make is that this album honestly has no weak tracks at all. Zero. Every song is, at worst, above average, while most could make equal claim to single of the year to this point.

                  Examples? Fake Tales of San Francisco, with its driving bass-line, shout-out chorus, and great lyrics... The View from the Afternoon, a perfect opener that sets the tone for the rest of the album... the unabashed rock and roll of Perhaps Vampires... in fact, this album ends so strongly that its ridiculous, with the great lyrics and varied sound of When the Sun Goes Down... probably my favorite track, From the Ritz to the Rubble (brilliant chorus, fantastic guitars, f&^cking brilliant... "You couldn't have done that on a Sunday, of course not!")... and finally the album closer, a Certain Romance with its opening drum and guitar attack before settling into a perfect UK retro-rock dance groove with a totally different sound, and great lyrics condemning the vapidness and bad behavior of today's youth even as the singer admits he has friends who are the same... this song has one of the best lines you're likely to hear this year: "Cause over there theres broken bones / There's only music so that theres new ring tones / And it don't take no Sherlock Holmes / To see its a little different around here"

                  I understand the backlash against this band (and so does the band, if one listens to their new EP), as they have seen an unfair amount of hype and hyperbole. The idea of comparing a band to the Beatles, after one album, is ridiculous. I understand the Oasis one a little better, as they are a more recent band, and Whatever People Say I am, Thats What I am Not has a similar quality to the first two Oasis albums, in that its hard to believe a band can burst onto the scene already sounding this polished and this distinct, and drop an album that is so solid front to back. So in theory, I get it. But musically this is an entirely different band, and they DESERVE to be hyped more than their compatriots (with the exception of Bloc Party, who are as good, but are an entirely different sound with a different mission). This band has no social or political mission to impart on us. This cd is, simply put, a great rock album, possibly the best of this millenium. Don't compare it to the best bands of all time, compare it to the current crop of what's out there - these guys absolutely blow away Hard-Fi, the Rakes, the Editors, Maximo Park, We Are Scientists, Kaiser Chiefs, etc etc. All of those bands have great albums and are some of my current favorites, but they aren't really traditional "rock" albums per se. The Arctic Monkeys have taken elements from all of these bands and infused it with what can only really be called traditional rock and roll, and I think that's what makes this cd so incredible.
                    • jcoat007's avatar
                      jcoat007
                      Brilliant!!! Such a fun album. I never get tired of it.
                      • tarwater3's avatar
                        tarwater3
                        Hey fellas, what about the quality of this repress? Thank you!

                        Master Release

                        Edit Master Release
                        Recently Edited

                        For sale on Discogs

                        Sell a copy

                        Statistics

                        • Avg Rating:4.47 / 5
                        • Ratings:5625
                        Ad

                        Videos (13)

                        Edit
                        Ad
                        Ad