Originally released in 1973. Standard gatefold sleeve with warranty card.
░̸̶̸░̸̶̸░̸̶̸ in runouts represents unreadable scratched-out characters.
Recorded at Abbey Road Studios, London between June 1972 and January 1973. States "Pressed in Japan" on the LP label (see images), "imported pressing" and "Printed in the U.S.A." on spine of the sleeve.
Came with two lists of other available MFSL releases and MFSL style inner.
On innersleeve: Half-Speed Mastering by Stan Ricker, JVC Super High Definition Vinyl (extended life) Imported Pressing Static Free Inner-Sleeve Source: the Original Stereo Master Tape.
Note on Credits: Though not specified in the liner notes, Barry St. John, Doris Troy, Lesley Duncan, and Liza Strike perform backing vocals only on tracks A4, B2, B4, and B5.
The 1979 release has an insert titled: "An Audiophile's Dream Come True" Also issued in 1981 with different inserts The Dark Side Of The Moon
Engineer Assistant Peter James miscredited on this edition of The Dark Side Of The Moon as "Peter Jones"
Barcode and Other Identifiers
Matrix / Runout (Runout A, variant 1): MFSL-1-017-A2-1 SR2 H213
Life changing. Phenomenal soundstage, amazing vocal clarity and punchy bass on this pressing. I’m speechless. DEAD Silent surface noise. This pressing is outstanding. Compared to the original 73’ UK pressing it holds its own. You can feel Every - Single - String.
Elaboration edit: With a pair of ‘younger’ (I say that lightly) Operator’s Ears and spun on a VPI running a Ortofon Black complimented by a BeoLab28 Theatre in a purpose built Listening Room; this pressing felt the best balanced compared to the Reels of DSOTM (played in a studio). The Japanese pressing, as with many others carried reverberations too deeply, often causing slight distractions during the deeper trance portions of the album with this system. Emphasis on ‘this system’ ; it is not the best - and it is not the worst. Down to personal preference really.
If you want a phenomenal PUNCHY well balanced pressing, at a great price? This is the go to pressing.
A very good pressing but not one of THE best (IMHO). I find it lacks the bottom end. Especially lacking is punchiness; especially on the beginning to "Time". However, it does have excellent clarity and upper range. The pressing is dead quiet, but it just feels that it's being held back.
Note: I'm comparing it to the '74 Japanese / EMI & '75 US pressing
Granted everyone's listening experience (and ears) are different.
Most people cannot afford a 1st UK pressing nor want to go down that rabbit hole. In that, how does this pressing and mastering by JVC compare to the two other popular masters Kevin Gray and Bernie Grundman? If you had to rank these three best to worst...
I got this for $20 from a dude that was selling records on Kijiji - it’s like a Canadian Craigslist... He claimed it was in “mint shape!”, so I drove 25 minutes to pick it up. I get there and he pulls it out of the jacket to show me how mint it was, and to my horror there was no protective inner sleeve! I’m nervously standing there watching him put his fingers directly on the vinyl surface while he yanks it from its cardboard-laced tomb. I could hear it scraping the coarse sides on the way out. The album had a ton of light scuffs, but nothing too deep. The dude was super proud of it, like it was a grade school project his kid made or something.
I’ve played it about a dozen times now, and it sounds phenomenal! Two songs have an audible clicking for about 3 revolutions or five seconds, the rest sounds pretty spectacular.
I wish I had the inserts. Dude probably lined a cat box with em…
The best version of this record so far imo. Everything is clear and the mix is nearly perfect. I still have to compare it the uhqr though! For the price, I would recommend this version over the 50th anniversary.
Now being able to compare the releases I have including this one on my own system its time to take a closer look at the differences. The most apparent qualities of the MoFi is its smoothness and depth. It goes beyond any other release Ive heard and really gives you the impression that this is what Pink Floyd wanted you to hear. It is by no means fuzzy however and gives great clarity with the right playback system. The shortcomings of the 2016 remaster are now more apparent than before being harsher and less deep. But the strength in that comes in giving a more present performance on the remaster while the MoFi is left more whimsical. I miss the in your face vocals of Time and even The Great Gig, if only slightly. But even more so I miss the bass. The Mofi does deliver bass but on its own terms in limited doses while the 2016 cut dumps my oh so needed craving of a tight earthquake in masses. It again circles around to the balanced nature of the Grundman remaster where even the lowest of low end mucks can be heard, felt and appreciated. But despite their differences the 2 are still sort of similar in delivery, just with these few but character defining traits. Both are cut about equally as quiet, demanding you to crank the volume knob. The advantage then shows in the MoFi as the vinyl is extremely quiet, almost as dead silent and void creating as my Japanese Pro Use copy, but thats just because the Pro Use doesnt need to be played nearly as loud. Its only really noticeable at the start and end of songs on the 2016 issue but still a very real difference. Grundmans cut stands as the well rounded and enjoyable alternative for anyone short on money and time, just inheriting a slight harshness and lack of reverb. The one Id give my nod to however is the MoFi for its impressive realism and smooth delivery. Despite the few shortcomings it probably has the best sounding version of Money that genuinely made me go "Holy shit..." and its the one I say is the essential AAA version for every Pink Floyd fan to own. If the MoFi rectified its slight slouching on bass plus vocal presence and punch it would easily rise to the top right away!
Current ranking: 1. MoFi's Side 2 (This) 2. UK Original A3/B3 Overall Best 3. 2016 Grundman Cut ?. MoFi UHQR ?. 30th Anniversary
FWIW, a recent update to images mentions a hype sticker on the "shrink wrap", but MFSLs of this era were not shrink wrapped; they were in a loose clear plastic wrap which extended about one quarter inch beyond the outer edge of the sleeve, and this wrap had a perforated tear-off strip at either the upper edge or the edge opposite the spine.
Upon detail study it looks like all the variants from the 1979 and the 1981 has identical matrixes/stampers... I have the 1981 pressing and it is STUNNING. I have compared it to both the UK A2/B2 - A3/B2 - 30th Anniversary and latest reissues... This is the one to get...