Ad

Release

Marketplace

125 For Sale from $18.75
Ad
Ad

Statistics

  • Last Sold:
  • Lowest:$16.67
  • Median:$24.95
  • Highest:$33.28

Videos (4)

Edit
Ad

Iron MaidenPowerslave

Label:Parlophone – 2564624869
Format:
Vinyl, LP, Album, Reissue, Remastered, 180g
Country:UK & Europe
Released:
Genre:Rock
Style:Heavy Metal

Tracklist

A1Aces High
Written-ByHarris*
4:31
A22 Minutes To Midnight
Written-BySmith*, Dickinson*
6:04
A3Losfer Words (Big 'Orra)
Written-ByHarris*
4:15
A4Flash Of The Blade
Written-ByDickinson*
4:05
A5The Duellists
Written-ByHarris*
6:18
B1Back In The Village
Written-BySmith*, Dickinson*
5:02
B2Powerslave
Written-ByDickinson*
7:12
B3Rime Of The Ancient Mariner
Written-ByHarris*
13:45
Ad

Companies, etc.

Credits

Notes

Issued with the original artwork, including printed inner sleeve containing lyrics and credits.

Recorded at Compass Point, Nassau, Bahamas
Mixed at Electric Ladyland, New York
Mastered at Sterling Sound, New York
All titles published by Imagem London Ltd.

℗ 1984 the copyright in the original sound recording is owned by Parlophone Records Ltd.
© 1984 Iron Maiden LLP
© 2014 Parlophone Records Ltd.
Printed in the EU

Made in EU

Barcode and Other Identifiers

  • Barcode: 8 2564624869 8
  • Barcode (Scanned): 825646248698
  • Rights Society: GEMA/MCPS
  • Label Code: LC0299
  • Other (A-side, center label, outer rim): 2564624869 / 1
  • Other (B-side, center label, outer rim): 2564624869 / 2
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A etched, variant 1): BC91092-01 A1 Λ3 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B etched, variant 1): BC91092-01 B2 i..i 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A etched, variant 2): BC91092-01 A1 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B etched, variant 2): BC91092-01 B1 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A etched, variant 3): BC91092-01 A1 2 = V [mirrored] 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B etched, variant 3): BC91092-01 B2 i..i 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A etched, variant 4): BC91092-01 A1 [3X (mirrored)] 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B etched, variant 4): BC91092-01 B2 i..i I↾√ 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A etched, variant 5): BC91092-01 A1 VƐ 9729511
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B etched, variant 5): BC91092-01 B2 i..i 9729511 +s

Other Versions (5 of 317)View All

Title (Format)LabelCat#CountryYear
Recently Edited
Powerslave (LP, Album)EMINZ EMC-232New Zealand1984
Recently Edited
Powerslave (LP, Album, Stereo)EMI, EMI, EMI, EMI1C 064 24 0200 1, 1C 064-24-0200 1, EJ 24 0200, 2402001Europe1984
Recently Edited
Powerslave (Cassette, Album)EMI, EMI238 7 46045 4, 7460454Netherlands1984
Recently Edited
Powerslave (LP, Album)Capitol RecordsSJ-12321US1984
Recently Edited
Powerslave (LP, Album)Jugoton, EMILSEMI 11082, EJ 2402001Yugoslavia1984
Tobi081523's avatar
Tobi081523
Edited one month ago
I listened to this in original press at a friend's place and despite it not being exactly my style just loved it. Since originals don't come cheap, I bought this ... and tell you, this is not anywhere near the original. The "remastering" made sonething like a typical Spotify crap out of it, sounds like Pop-Music. Horrible.

Will sell and hunt for an original.

And before someone makes a clever remark, when I rate records, I do this to rate the music, not the print or issue, makes my collection easier to navigate.
hdorne's avatar
hdorne
I bought a couple of these reissues and ultimately ended up selling them and buying original pressings. These aren’t awful, but they’re pressed so quietly that turning them up to an audible, rockable level also greatly increases surface noise and hum. I’ve never owned any other records pressed this quietly, and having some background in audio engineering I can’t understand why they wouldn’t make the most of the signal-to-noise ratio, especially on an inherently noisy format. The originals sound explosively dynamic and crystal clear, the artwork looks better, plus you get the occasional merch order form tucked into the sleeve so you can pretend your Mom is angry that you own this record. These reissues seem like they were sort of half-executed; the originals are where it’s at.
Z0M81E's avatar
Z0M81E
Nice quiet pressing (after cleaning!), clear sound, a little too bright and light on bass, nothing that can't be solved with adjusting your eq. Just like every other Maiden repress from 2014, you gotta crank it up to really kick in. Great dynmics, no inner groove distortion. Listened on Ortofon OM10
stein.plassen's avatar
stein.plassen
How about rinsing your records before putting them on the turntable when you get home from the record store? Then you get rid of all surface noises, and then the sound gets more open and dynamic. Of course there are bad represses out there from digital sources, but the Maiden catalog is pretty good apart from the NOTB album. And make sure your cartridge allignment is correct before writing terrible reviews on records. The worst records are ALWAYS the new unused ones before they got rinsed by okki nokki or humminguru ultrasonic cleaner.
Full-of-Hate's avatar
Full-of-Hate
Edited 7 months ago
The downside of the success of a band like Iron Maiden is an endless exchange of opinions about and without reason. The album "Powerslave" has been discussed so many times in its almost forty-year history that in fact we have only one truth - this record does not leave anyone indifferent. This album has brought up a good musical taste for several generations of heavy music fans, while it can be said that the band has definitely outlived part of its audience. At the same time, the audience is still so large that individual replicas of its members are simply surprising (in a bad way).

I can say for myself that the record was bought brand new and sounds great, moreover, the nature of the sound is pleasantly impressive. It's hard for me to call the sound flat, muddy, distorted, compressed or something like that. Objectively, the record is devoid of the listed properties, which is why the "one star" type estimates are simply incomprehensible. I can assume that with such a large number of copies, there is a certain number of defective copies, as well as second hand/used and damaged by previous owners or during transportation. Similarly, it is unclear in what condition the equipment of people who have left a negative review is (condition and setting tone, for example), as well as the condition of the vinyl itself - it can be trite soiled in dust. I think you should trust only your own hearing and your own setup.

This press is a regular edition available anywhere in the world, made in such quantity that it will satisfy the needs of a sufficiently large number of collectors for a little money. Of course, a record once released in 1984 cannot sound exactly like a record released in 2014. When some people realize this fact, their life will become much easier. In addition, now you can simply order a press on Discogs that will satisfy your taste with its sound. Now we have a choice that once people could not even dream of.

Gorban's avatar
Gorban
I think it is a very nice pressing. To me it sounds very good. I just think the colours on the cover are too bright. I like more the cover of my older version.
melvin2204's avatar
melvin2204
I just listen to the music and it sounds great
StaindClass's avatar
StaindClass
This pressing is not terrible, but it's also not as punchy as my original pressing which I've miraculously been able to keep in really great shape since I bought it as a teen and didn't have a great record player at the time. The sound is noticeably lower than the original, and there's a mysterious sound drop on A5, "The Duellists." I commented on this as a reply to another post. That being said, it does sound clear, but you just have to crank it up more to get the feel of the original.
deanthotube's avatar
deanthotube
My copy is one of the bad ones I guess, sounds pretty good one minute, then the next it sounds like a distorted compressed digital mess!
There is definitely a very noticeable volume drop on the later tracks as well.
I immediately had to play something else to make sure my turntable wasnt f'n up!
Matt_19's avatar
Matt_19
Didn't enjoy the sound on this pressing at all. I dont have another copy to compare to, but I thought it sounded relatively flat and muddy.