Another_Swede

I don't sell any of my records.

Please only contact me if I will gain something from it!

Been around since the first version of Discogs and with each update new rules how to submit a release have been applied, therefor some of my older submissions might seem incorrect compared to todays standard. Have been using Discogs longer then my profile states, don't know why the date is incorrect, possible it happened when the second version came into action. Also have to admit that YEARS ago I submitted a lot of stuff from another collector sites especially for the labels West End, Bottom Line & Salsoul which isn't a good thing to do but you have to understand when Discogs was VERY small and there was so much releases missing in the database that the site wasn't really functional. It was important to fill the label catalogs to make more people use Discogs and that way giving it a snowball effect (which really worked). This was accepted at the time, no one could ever imagine how successful and huge Discogs would become! The first version wasn't very user friendly, submissions could be pending for six months mostly because there was (If I remember right) only ONE Editor and Moderator. Today people have forgotten who really build this site, guys like DJ Insomnia, Moogman and Walli. I was the one who demanded that people had to leave Producer credits, not just in notes and since my fellow Moderators didn't agree with that I actually got fired as a Mod, later I was asked to join again. Also fought for YEARS that Soul and Funk would be accepted in Discogs. It has been a long journey but now it's working well and definitely hundred times better then just a few years ago. The system just gets better and better it's going to be excellent, close to perfect! There is a reason why the old "first rule" of Discogs "Relax, Discogs is never going to be perfect" have been removed.